EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zev Shirazi
dblp:378/6184
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-7578-2881ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems › computational effects
graded monads |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Relative Monadic Metalanguage · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026 |
Programming languages and type systems
lambda calculus |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Relative Monadic Metalanguage · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026 |
Programming languages and type systems › computational effects
monadic metalanguage |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Relative Monadic Metalanguage · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026 |
Programming languages and type systems
type systems |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Relative Monadic Metalanguage · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026 |
Logic in computer science
categorical semantics |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | The Relative Monadic Metalanguage · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monad theory · 2.0conservative extension proof · 2.0categorical semantics · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Relative Monadic MetalanguageabstractRelative monads provide a controlled view of computation. We generalise the monadic metalanguage to a relative setting and give a complete semantics with strong relative monads. Adopting this perspective, we generalise two existing program calculi from the literature. We provide a linear-non-linear language for graded monads, LNL-RMM, along with a semantic proof that it is a conservative extension of the graded monadic metalanguage. Additionally, we provide a complete semantics for the arrow calculus, showing it is a restricted relative monadic metalanguage. This motivates the introduction of ARMM, a computational lambda calculus-style language for arrows that conservatively extends the arrow calculus. Jack Liell-Cock, Zev Shirazi, Sam Staton |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |