Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luke Eilers
dblp:378/6725
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-0123-5092ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 56% Learning theory · 44% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory › channel capacity
capacity-achieving input distribution |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Phase Transitions of the Additive Uniform Noise Channel With Peak Amplitude and Cost Constraint · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Information theory
channel capacity |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Phase Transitions of the Additive Uniform Noise Channel With Peak Amplitude and Cost Constraint · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A generalized neural tangent kernel for surrogate gradient learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › spiking neural network
surrogate gradient |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A generalized neural tangent kernel for surrogate gradient learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spiking neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A generalized neural tangent kernel for surrogate gradient learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantization · 1.0peak amplitude and cost constraints · 1.0surrogate gradient · 0.8neural tangent kernel · 0.8kernel regression · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Phase Transitions of the Additive Uniform Noise Channel With Peak Amplitude and Cost ConstraintabstractUnder which condition is quantization optimal? We address this question in the context of the additive uniform noise channel under peak amplitude and cost constraints. We compute analytically the capacity-achieving input distribution as a function of the noise level, the average cost constraint, and the curvature of the cost function. We find that when the cost function is concave, the capacity-achieving input distribution is discrete, whereas when the cost function is convex and the cost constraint is active, the support of the capacity-achieving input distribution spans the entire interval. For the cases of a discrete capacity-achieving input distribution, we derive the analytical expressions for the capacity of the channel. Jonas Stapmanns, Luke Eilers, Catarina Dias, Tobias Kühn, Jean-Pascal Pfister |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2025 | Capacity-Achieving Input Distribution of the Additive Uniform Noise Channel with Peak Amplitude and Cost ConstraintabstractUnder which condition is quantization optimal? We address this question in the context of the additive uniform noise channel under peak amplitude and cost constraints. We compute analytically the capacity-achieving input distribution as a function of the noise level, the average cost constraint, and the exponent of the cost function. We found that when the cost function is concave, the capacity-achieving input distribution is discrete, whereas when the cost function is convex and the cost constraint is active, the support of the capacity-achieving input distribution spans the entire interval. Jonas Stapmanns, Catarina Dias, Luke Eilers, Jean-Pascal Pfister |
ISIT | 3 |
| 2024 | A generalized neural tangent kernel for surrogate gradient learningabstractState-of-the-art neural network training methods depend on the gradient of the network function. Therefore, they cannot be applied to networks whose activation functions do not have useful derivatives, such as binary and discrete-time spiking neural networks. To overcome this problem, the activation function's derivative is commonly substituted with a surrogate derivative, giving rise to surrogate gradient learning (SGL). This method works well in practice but lacks theoretical foundation.
The neural tangent kernel (NTK) has proven successful in the analysis of gradient descent. Here, we provide a generalization of the NTK, which we call the surrogate gradient NTK, that enables the analysis of SGL. First, we study a naive extension of the NTK to activation functions with jumps, demonstrating that gradient descent for such activation functions is also ill-posed in the infinite-width limit. To address this problem, we generalize the NTK to gradient descent with surrogate derivatives, i.e., SGL. We carefully define this generalization and expand the existing key theorems on the NTK with mathematical rigor. Further, we illustrate our findings with numerical experiments. Finally, we numerically compare SGL in networks with sign activation function and finite width to kernel regression with the surrogate gradient NTK; the results confirm that the surrogate gradient NTK provides a good characterization of SGL. Luke Eilers, Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Sven Goedeke |
NeurIPS | 1 |