EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amedeo Pachera
dblp:378/9040
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-4051-6008ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Graph data management · 65% Data integration and cleaning · 28% Data models and query languages · 6% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing › data cleaning
data repair |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | User-Centric Property Graph Repairs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Graph data management
graph data model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What If: Causal Analysis with Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Graph data management
graph query processing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What If: Causal Analysis with Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Graph data management › graph data model
property graph |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | User-Centric Property Graph Repairs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
inconsistency detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | User-Centric Property Graph Repairs · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.9independent set · 0.9directed acyclic graph · 0.9counterfactual reasoning · 0.9causal inference · 0.9assignment algorithm · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | User-Centric Property Graph RepairsabstractProperty graphs serve as unifying abstractions for encoding, inspecting, and updating interconnected data with greater expressive power. They are increasingly popular across various application domains involving real users. However, graph data often contains inconsistencies that need proper transformations to address underlying constraint violations and often require specific domain knowledge. In this paper, we propose an interactive and user-centric approach to repair property graphs under denial constraints. Our approach includes a novel theoretical framework comprising a query-based inconsistency detection mechanism, a dependency graph for tracking violations, and an assignment algorithm facilitating multi-user property graph repairs by leveraging independent sets. We evaluate our approach through several experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets, considering different levels of user expertise and comparing against various baselines. Even with multiple non-oracle users, our approach outperforms existing interactive and non-interactive baselines by 30% on average in terms of repair quality. Additionally, we conduct a user study to assess real user performance in property graph repairs. Amedeo Pachera, Angela Bonifati, Andrea Mauri 0001 |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 1 |
| 2025 | What If: Causal Analysis with Graph DatabasesabstractGraphs are powerful abstractions for modeling relationships and enabling data science tasks. In causal inference, Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) serve as a key formalism, but they are typically handcrafted by experts and rarely treated as first-class data artifacts in graph data management systems. This paper presents a novel vision to align causal analysis with property graphs—the foundation of modern graph databases—by rethinking graph models to incorporate hypernodes, structural equations, and causality-aware query semantics. By unifying graph databases with causal reasoning, our approach enables the declarative expression of DAG manipulation operations along with interventions and counterfactuals, combining expressiveness with computational efficiency. We validate this vision through a proof-of-concept implementation supporting scalable causal queries over DAGs, ultimately aiming to make graph databases causally aware and support data-driven, personalized decision-making across several scientific domains. Amedeo Pachera, Mattia Palmiotto, Angela Bonifati, Andrea Mauri 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |