Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorenzo Lagostina

dblp:379/3107 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 67% Integrated circuit design · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › sequential circuit optimization
retiming
0.812024
Mix & Latch: Comparison With State-of-the-Art Retiming on a RISC-V Benchmark · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
sequential circuit design
0.812024
Mix & Latch: Comparison With State-of-the-Art Retiming on a RISC-V Benchmark · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Electronic design automation › physical design
timing optimization
0.812024
Mix & Latch: Comparison With State-of-the-Art Retiming on a RISC-V Benchmark · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

post-synthesis timing analysis · 0.8mix & latch · 0.8critical path analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Design for testability using mixed-polarity flip-flops and latches
abstract
Sequential circuits employing a combination of mixed-polarity flip-flops and latches allow significant improvements in clock frequency compared to useful skew and retiming. However, no work addresses the task of enabling a scan- based test on a circuit optimized with such techniques, while simultaneously minimizing the area overhead due to shadow latches used to complete the scan chain when latches are used in the design. This poses a serious limitation to the industrial application of mixed FF and latch-based techniques, since post-fabrication tests are an unavoidable step in IC production. This paper presents a macro-cell structure to enable both the exploitation of time borrowing for frequency optimization and the execution of the scan test of a design. The proposed solution requires minimal changes in the test setup and is evaluated using a recent methodology, Mix&Latch. Moreover, the work proposes modifications to Mix&Latch that allow reusing the standard cells introduced for the scan test to solve hold timing violations, avoiding additional hardware overhead. Results show that the lumped cell structure does not significantly impact frequency gains, and the ILP formulation of latch and FF type optimization can be extended to cover the DFT optimization part, ensuring only a moderate increase in area and power consumption, comparable with the DFT impact on regular FF-based designs.
Lorenzo Lagostina, Jordi Cortadella, Mario R. Casu, Luciano Lavagno
DATE1
2024 Mix & Latch: Comparison With State-of-the-Art Retiming on a RISC-V Benchmark
abstract
Flip-flops (FFs) are the most commonly used sequential elements in synchronous circuits, but their timing requirements limit the operating frequency. Borrowing time with a latch-based approach can increase operating frequency, but traditional back-end optimization tools struggle to manage hold time requirements. The Mix & Latch technique achieves higher frequencies and often lower area than commercial state-of-the-art retiming by exploiting four types of synchronous sequential gates, namely, positive and negative edge-triggered flip-flops (FFs) and positive and negative transparent latches, all using a single clock tree.In this article, we first significantly accelerate the Mix & Latch flow convergence with respect to past work, by using a post-synthesis-based timing analysis that eliminates the first placement and routing needed for post-layout timing analysis. Then, by adding tolerance margins to the timing model, the pessimism is reduced to improve both convergence speed and maximum frequency. Finally, we reduce the complexity of the problem by applying the methodology only to the sequential elements belonging to critical paths. The effectiveness of Mix & Latch is then demonstrated on a RISC-V processor core from the Pulp platform using 28nm CMOS FDSOI technology. The results are compared to both the original Mix & Latch flow and a retiming performed with a state-of-the-art tool, showing a 25% frequency improvement over the original flow and 7.5% over the retiming flow. Compared to the retiming flow, we achieve comparable or lower power and area, while preserving the original registers and allowing logic equivalence checking.
Lorenzo Lagostina, Filippo Minnella, Jordi Cortadella, Mario R. Casu, Mihai T. Lazarescu, Luciano Lavagno
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1