Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Beng-Ti Ang

dblp:379/3741 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Segmentation and scene understanding · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
brain tumor segmentation
1.012026
Tackling Dual-stage Missing Modalities in Brain Tumor Segmentation via Robust Modality Reconstruction and Prompt-guided Modality Adaptation · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation
1.012026
Tackling Dual-stage Missing Modalities in Brain Tumor Segmentation via Robust Modality Reconstruction and Prompt-guided Modality Adaptation · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › learning with incomplete data
missing modality
1.012026
Tackling Dual-stage Missing Modalities in Brain Tumor Segmentation via Robust Modality Reconstruction and Prompt-guided Modality Adaptation · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
modality-invariant representation learning
1.012026
Tackling Dual-stage Missing Modalities in Brain Tumor Segmentation via Robust Modality Reconstruction and Prompt-guided Modality Adaptation · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
multimodal segmentation
1.012026
Tackling Dual-stage Missing Modalities in Brain Tumor Segmentation via Robust Modality Reconstruction and Prompt-guided Modality Adaptation · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt-guided adaptation · 1.0mask-reconstruction pre-training · 1.0knowledge distillation · 1.0distribution approximation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Tackling Dual-stage Missing Modalities in Brain Tumor Segmentation via Robust Modality Reconstruction and Prompt-guided Modality Adaptation
abstract
Addressing missing modalities is a critical challenge in multimodal brain tumor segmentation. Most existing approaches merely handle modality-incomplete inputs during inference, assuming a full set of modalities for all training samples. However, this unrealistic assumption limits the usage of abundant modality-incomplete data commonly observed in clinical practice. In this paper, we explore a more practical task of tackling missing modalities during both training and inference. We propose a universal model featuring robust modality reconstruction and prompt-guided modality adaptation. Our mask-reconstruction pre-training enables robust modality-invariant representation learning, during which we design a novel distribution approximation method that supervises the reconstruction of absent modalities without requiring full-modal training data. Afterwards, when adapting our model to the segmentation task, we introduce the complete-then-distill (CTD) paradigm, which first estimates missing modalities in training samples from the available ones, and then distills the knowledge from the reconstructed full-modal representations to enhance learning from modality-incomplete data. Moreover, we propose prompt-guided modality adaptation to personalize a subset of model parameters during CTD, enabling the model to adapt to each distinct modality input scenario by using prompts with rich visual-textual information. Extensive experiments on two brain tumor segmentation benchmarks show our method consistently surpasses previous state-of-the-art approaches under dual-stage missing modality settings across various missing ratios.
Cheng Chen 0013, Qing You Pang, Yibing Fu, Quanzheng Li, Carol Tang, Beng-Ti Ang, Yueming Jin
AAAI7