Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heecheol Yun
dblp:379/5127
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 62% Efficient and distributed learning · 38% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PruNeRF: Segment-Centric Dataset Pruning via 3D Spatial Consistency · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
neural radiance field |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PruNeRF: Segment-Centric Dataset Pruning via 3D Spatial Consistency · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PruNeRF: Segment-Centric Dataset Pruning via 3D Spatial Consistency · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
spatial consistency |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PruNeRF: Segment-Centric Dataset Pruning via 3D Spatial Consistency · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
segmentation · 0.8influence functions · 0.8depth-based reprojection · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PruNeRF: Segment-Centric Dataset Pruning via 3D Spatial ConsistencyabstractNeural Radiance Fields (NeRF) have shown remarkable performance in learning 3D scenes. However, NeRF exhibits vulnerability when confronted with distractors in the training images -- unexpected objects are present only within specific views, such as moving entities like pedestrians or birds. Excluding distractors during dataset construction is a straightforward solution, but without prior knowledge of their types and quantities, it becomes prohibitively expensive. In this paper, we propose PruNeRF, a segment-centric dataset pruning framework via 3D spatial consistency, that effectively identifies and prunes the distractors. We first examine existing metrics for measuring pixel-wise distraction and introduce Influence Functions for more accurate measurements. Then, we assess 3D spatial consistency using a depth-based reprojection technique to obtain 3D-aware distraction. Furthermore, we incorporate segmentation for pixel-to-segment refinement, enabling more precise identification. Our experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that PruNeRF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in robustness against distractors. Yeonsung Jung, Heecheol Yun, Joonhyung Park, Jin-Hwa Kim, Eunho Yang |
ICML | 2 |