Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Donglei Yu
dblp:379/5980
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Machine translation · 40% Language models and text generation · 21% Vision and language · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › simultaneous machine translation
read/write policy |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SimulPL: Aligning Human Preferences in Simultaneous Machine Translation · ICLR 2025 Self-Modifying State Modeling for Simultaneous Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
simultaneous machine translation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SimulPL: Aligning Human Preferences in Simultaneous Machine Translation · ICLR 2025 Self-Modifying State Modeling for Simultaneous Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions · ACL (1) 2025 Large Language Models Know What is Key Visual Entity: An LLM-assisted Multimodal Retrieval for VQA · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › simultaneous machine translation
simultaneous speech translation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient and Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translation with Fully Unidirectional Architecture · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient and Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translation with Fully Unidirectional Architecture · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
ambiguity resolution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
interactive clarification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
preference alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SimulPL: Aligning Human Preferences in Simultaneous Machine Translation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fixing Distribution Shifts of LLM Self-Critique via On-Policy Self-Play Training · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual question answering
knowledge-based visual question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Know What is Key Visual Entity: An LLM-assisted Multimodal Retrieval for VQA · EMNLP 2024 |
Information retrieval
multimodal retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Know What is Key Visual Entity: An LLM-assisted Multimodal Retrieval for VQA · EMNLP 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Know What is Key Visual Entity: An LLM-assisted Multimodal Retrieval for VQA · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient and Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translation with Fully Unidirectional Architecture · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
complex reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Fixing Distribution Shifts of LLM Self-Critique via On-Policy Self-Play Training · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SimulPL: Aligning Human Preferences in Simultaneous Machine Translation · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual Questions · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unidirectional architecture · 1.0policy head · 1.0multi-stage training · 1.0data curation · 1.0rule-based reward · 0.9preference learning · 0.9on-policy reinforcement learning · 0.9monte carlo sampling · 0.9large language model prompting · 0.9automated ambiguity-clarification data generation · 0.9multimodal joint retrieval · 0.8large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Efficient and Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translation with Fully Unidirectional ArchitectureabstractSimultaneous speech translation (SimulST) produces translations incrementally while processing partial speech input. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in offline translation tasks, applying them to SimulST poses notable challenges. Existing LLM-based SimulST approaches either incur significant computational overhead due to repeated encoding of bidirectional speech encoder, or they depend on a fixed read/write policy, limiting the efficiency and performance. In this work, we introduce Efficient and Adaptive Simultaneous Speech Translation (EASiST) with fully unidirectional architecture, including both speech encoder and LLM. EASiST includes a multi-latency data curation strategy to generate semantically aligned SimulST training samples and redefines SimulST as an interleaved generation task with explicit read/write tokens. To facilitate adaptive inference, we incorporate a lightweight policy head that dynamically predicts read/write actions. Additionally, we employ a multi-stage training strategy to align speech-text modalities and optimize both translation and policy behavior. Experiments on both in-domain (MuST-C) and out-of-domain (Europarl-ST) En-De and En-Es datasets demonstrate that EASiST offers superior latency-quality trade-offs compared to several strong baselines. Biao Fu, Donglei Yu, Minpeng Liao, Chengxi Li 0014, Xinjie Chen, Yidong Chen 0001, Kai Fan 0002, Xiaodong Shi |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Fixing Distribution Shifts of LLM Self-Critique via On-Policy Self-Play TrainingabstractSelf-critique mechanisms significantly improve the performance of language models in complex reasoning tasks by giving them the ability to correct errors, conduct induction and deduction, and switch thinking insights. However, synthetic data methods often require human-introduced errors or sampling of the model’s reasoning results from the previous moment, and the current output distribution of the model cannot be obtained, makes the data for critique and reasoning face the problem of distribution shifts. In this work, we propose an on-policy reinforcement learning framework to synchronize the reasoning and critique capabilities of language models. To alleviate reward hacking caused by outcome-based supervision, we design a deliberate reward framework for different purposes. The reward framework not only supervises the model reasoning process based on the results, but also uses Monte Carlo sampling to give appropriate rewards to the critique content according to the success rate of the model’s correction after critique. In addition, we introduce a rule-based reward function to impose penalties on the model when it generates hallucinatory critiques. When our approach is applied to the DeepSeek-Math-7B-Base and Qwen2.5-7B-Base models, model performance improves 5.40 and 3.66 points, respectively, compared to the best baseline approach. This validates the significant advantages of our method in improving model’s reasoning and self-critique capability. Code will be made available at https://github.com/rbao2018/SCOP Rong Bao, Donglei Yu, Kai Fan 0002, Minpeng Liao |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Teaching Vision-Language Models to Ask: Resolving Ambiguity in Visual QuestionsabstractIn visual question answering (VQA) context, users often pose ambiguous questions to visual language models (VLMs) due to varying expression habits.Existing research addresses such ambiguities primarily by rephrasing questions.These approaches neglect the inherently interactive nature of user interactions with VLMs, where ambiguities can be clarified through user feedback.However, research on interactive clarification faces two major challenges: (1) Benchmarks are absent to assess VLMs' capacity for resolving ambiguities through interaction; (2) VLMs are trained to prefer answering rather than asking, preventing them from seeking clarification.To overcome these challenges, we introduce ClearVQA benchmark 1 , which targets three common categories of ambiguity in VQA context, and encompasses various VQA scenarios.Furthermore, we propose an automated pipeline to generate ambiguity-clarification question pairs.Experimental results demonstrate that training based on the automated generated data enables VLMs to ask reasonable clarification questions, thereby generating more accurate and specific answers based on user feedback. Pu Jian, Donglei Yu, Shuo Ren 0002, Jiajun Zhang 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | SimulPL: Aligning Human Preferences in Simultaneous Machine TranslationabstractSimultaneous Machine Translation (SiMT) generates translations while receiving streaming source inputs. This requires the SiMT model to learn a read/write policy, deciding when to translate and when to wait for more source input. Numerous linguistic studies indicate that audiences in SiMT scenarios have distinct preferences, such as accurate translations, simpler syntax, and no unnecessary latency. Aligning SiMT models with these human preferences is crucial to improve their performances. However, this issue still remains unexplored. Additionally, preference optimization for SiMT task is also challenging. Existing methods focus solely on optimizing the generated responses, ignoring human preferences related to latency and the optimization of read/write policy during the preference optimization phase. To address these challenges, we propose Simultaneous Preference Learning (SimulPL), a preference learning framework tailored for the SiMT task. In the SimulPL framework, we categorize SiMT human preferences into five aspects: **translation quality preference**, **monotonicity preference**, **key point preference**, **simplicity preference**, and **latency preference**. By leveraging the first four preferences, we construct human preference prompts to efficiently guide GPT-4/4o in generating preference data for the SiMT task. In the preference optimization phase, SimulPL integrates **latency preference** into the optimization objective and enables SiMT models to improve the read/write policy, thereby aligning with human preferences more effectively. Experimental results indicate that SimulPL exhibits better alignment with human preferences across all latency levels in Zh$\rightarrow$En, De$\rightarrow$En and En$\rightarrow$Zh SiMT tasks. Our data and code will be available at https://github.com/EurekaForNLP/SimulPL. Donglei Yu, Yang Zhao 0007, Yangyifan Xu, Yu Zhou 0001, Chengqing Zong |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Investigating Hallucinations in Simultaneous Machine Translation: Knowledge Distillation Solution and Components AnalysisabstractDonglei Yu, Xiaomian Kang, Yuchen Liu, Feifei Zhai, Nanchang Cheng, Yu Zhou, Chengqing Zong. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Donglei Yu, Xiaomian Kang, Yuchen Liu 0007, Feifei Zhai, Nanchang Cheng, Yu Zhou 0001, Chengqing Zong |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 1 |
| 2024 | Self-Modifying State Modeling for Simultaneous Machine TranslationabstractSimultaneous Machine Translation (SiMT) generates target outputs while receiving stream source inputs and requires a read/write policy to decide whether to wait for the next source token or generate a new target token, whose decisions form a decision path.Existing SiMT methods, which learn the policy by exploring various decision paths in training, face inherent limitations.These methods not only fail to precisely optimize the policy due to the inability to accurately assess the individual impact of each decision on SiMT performance, but also cannot sufficiently explore all potential paths because of their vast number.Besides, building decision paths requires unidirectional encoders to simulate streaming source inputs, which impairs the translation quality of SiMT models.To solve these issues, we propose Self-Modifying State Modeling (SM 2 ), a novel training paradigm for SiMT task.Without building decision paths, SM 2 individually optimizes decisions at each state during training.To precisely optimize the policy, SM 2 introduces Self-Modifying process to independently assess and adjust decisions at each state.For sufficient exploration, SM 2 proposes Prefix Sampling to efficiently traverse all potential states.Moreover, SM 2 ensures compatibility with bidirectional encoders, thus achieving higher translation quality.Experiments show that SM 2 outperforms strong baselines.Furthermore, SM 2 allows offline machine translation models to acquire SiMT ability with fine-tuning 1 . Donglei Yu, Xiaomian Kang, Yuchen Liu 0007, Yu Zhou 0001, Chengqing Zong |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Large Language Models Know What is Key Visual Entity: An LLM-assisted Multimodal Retrieval for VQAabstractVisual question answering (VQA) tasks, often performed by visual language model (VLM), face challenges with long-tail knowledge.Recent retrieval-augmented VQA (RA-VQA) systems address this by retrieving and integrating external knowledge sources.However, these systems still suffer from redundant visual information irrelevant to the question during retrieval.To address these issues, in this paper, we propose LLM-RA , a novel method leveraging the reasoning capability of a large language model (LLM) to identify key visual entities, thus minimizing the impact of irrelevant information in the query of retriever.Furthermore, key visual entities are independently encoded for multimodal joint retrieval, preventing cross-entity interference.Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms other strong RA-VQA systems.In two knowledge-intensive VQA benchmarks, our method achieves the new state-of-the-art performance among those with similar scale of parameters and even performs comparably to models with 1-2 orders larger parameters. Pu Jian, Donglei Yu, Jiajun Zhang 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |