Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yara Shamshoum

dblp:379/5983 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › memory-augmented neural networks
differentiable neural computer
0.812024
DNCs Require More Planning Steps · ICML 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge incorporation › knowledge-infused learning › neuro-symbolic learning
neural algorithmic reasoning
0.812024
DNCs Require More Planning Steps · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generalization analysis · 0.8differentiable neural computer · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CompAct: Compressed Activations for Memory-Efficient LLM Training
abstract
Yara Shamshoum, Nitzan Hodos, Yuval Sieradzki, Assaf Schuster. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Yara Shamshoum, Nitzan Hodos, Yuval Sieradzki, Assaf Schuster
NAACL (Long Papers)1
2024 DNCs Require More Planning Steps
abstract
Many recent works use machine learning models to solve various complex algorithmic problems. However, these models attempt to reach a solution without considering the problem’s required computational complexity, which can be detrimental to their ability to solve it correctly. In this work we investigate the effect of computational time and memory on generalization of implicit algorithmic solvers. To do so, we focus on the Differentiable Neural Computer (DNC), a general problem solver that also lets us reason directly about its usage of time and memory. In this work, we argue that the number of planning steps the model is allowed to take, which we call ”planning budget”, is a constraint that can cause the model to generalize poorly and hurt its ability to fully utilize its external memory. We evaluate our method on Graph Shortest Path, Convex Hull, Graph MinCut and Associative Recall, and show how the planning budget can drastically change the behavior of the learned algorithm, in terms of learned time complexity, training time, stability and generalization to inputs larger than those seen during training.
Yara Shamshoum, Nitzan Hodos, Yuval Sieradzki, Assaf Schuster
ICML1