Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Aponte
dblp:379/6116
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-5719-554XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 33% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 33% High-performance computing · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 79% Deep learning architectures and training · 21% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Joint Structured Pruning and Quantization for Efficient Neural Network Training and Compression · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
quantization-aware training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Joint Structured Pruning and Quantization for Efficient Neural Network Training and Compression · CVPR 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU programming
GPU code generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPLAT: A Framework for Optimised GPU Code-Generation for SParse reguLar ATtention · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › sparsity exploitation
sparse attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPLAT: A Framework for Optimised GPU Code-Generation for SParse reguLar ATtention · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
High-performance computing › sparse linear algebra
sparse matrix storage format |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPLAT: A Framework for Optimised GPU Code-Generation for SParse reguLar ATtention · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › multi-head attention
multi-head self-attention |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SPLAT: A Framework for Optimised GPU Code-Generation for SParse reguLar ATtention · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
neural network compression |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic Joint Structured Pruning and Quantization for Efficient Neural Network Training and Compression · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
sparse attention |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SPLAT: A Framework for Optimised GPU Code-Generation for SParse reguLar ATtention · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tiling · 1.7just-in-time analysis · 1.7code generation · 1.7quantization-aware dependency graph · 0.9partially projected stochastic gradient · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Automatic Joint Structured Pruning and Quantization for Efficient Neural Network Training and CompressionabstractStructured pruning and quantization are fundamental techniques used to reduce the size of deep neural networks (DNNs), and typically are applied independently. Applying these techniques jointly via co-optimization has the potential to produce smaller, high-quality models. However, existing joint schemes are not widely used because of (1) engineering difficulties (complicated multi-stage processes), (2) black-box optimization (extensive hyperparameter tuning to control the overall compression), and (3) insufficient architecture generalization. To address these limitations, we present the framework GETA, which automatically and efficiently performs joint structured pruning and quantization- aware training on any DNN. GETA introduces three key innovations: (i) a quantization-aware dependency graph (QADG) that constructs a pruning search space for generic quantization-aware DNN, (ii) a partially projected stochastic gradient method that guarantees layerwise bit constraints are satisfied, and (iii) a new joint learning strategy that incorporates interpretable relationships between pruning and quantization. We present numerical experiments on both convolutional neural networks and transformer architectures that show that our approach achieves competitive (often superior) performance compared to existing joint pruning and quantization methods. Source code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/GETA. Xiaoyi Qu, David Aponte, Colby R. Banbury, Daniel P. Robinson, Tianyu Ding, Kazuhito Koishida, Ilya Zharkov |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2025 | SPLAT: A Framework for Optimised GPU Code-Generation for SParse reguLar ATtentionabstractMulti-head-self-attention (MHSA) mechanisms achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance across natural language processing and vision tasks. However, their quadratic dependence on sequence lengths has bottlenecked inference speeds. To circumvent this bottleneck, researchers have proposed various sparse-MHSA models, where a subset of full attention is computed. Despite their promise, current sparse libraries and compilers do not support high-performance implementations for diverse sparse-MHSA patterns due to the underlying sparse formats they operate on. These formats are either too specialised, failing to cover a wide-range of sparse patterns, or too general, incurring high metadata overhead when computing on the moderately sparse (10-50% non-zeros) matrices present in sparse-MHSA. We bridge this gap, achieving both generality and performance, by proposing a novel sparse format: affine-compressed-sparse-row (ACSR) and supporting code-generation scheme, SPLAT, that generates highperformance implementations for diverse sparse-MHSA patterns on GPUs. Core to our proposed format and code generation algorithm is the observation that common sparse-MHSA patterns have uniquely regular geometric properties. These properties, which can be analyzed just-in-time, expose novel optimizations and tiling strategies that SPLAT exploits to generate high-performance implementations for diverse patterns. To demonstrate SPLAT’s efficacy, we use it to generate code for various sparse-MHSA models, achieving speedups of up-to 2.05x and 4.05x over hand-written kernels written in Triton and TVM respectively on A100 GPUs in single-precision. Ahan Gupta, Yueming Yuan, Devansh Jain 0001, Yuhao Ge, David Aponte, Yanqi Zhou, Charith Mendis |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 5 |
| 2024 | LiveSpeech: Low-Latency Zero-shot Text-to-Speech via Autoregressive Modeling of Audio Discrete Codes
Trung Dang 0002, David Aponte, Dung N. Tran, Kazuhito Koishida |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |