Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingyang Ou
dblp:379/6153
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-6162-0572ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 62% Language models and text generation · 29% Multi-agent systems · 10% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
2.6 | 3 | 2025 | Large Language Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 Effective and Efficient Masked Image Generation Models · ICML 2025 Your Absorbing Discrete Diffusion Secretly Models the Conditional Distributions of Clean Data · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › discrete diffusion model
diffusion language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Language Model for Efficient Search Agents · SIGIR 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
search agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Language Model for Efficient Search Agents · SIGIR 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › agentic AI
tool-augmented agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Language Model for Efficient Search Agents · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Your Absorbing Discrete Diffusion Secretly Models the Conditional Distributions of Clean Data · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Large Language Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › discrete diffusion model
masked diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective and Efficient Masked Image Generation Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › discrete generative model
masked image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective and Efficient Masked Image Generation Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Language Model for Efficient Search Agents · SIGIR 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Language Model for Efficient Search Agents · SIGIR 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Your Absorbing Discrete Diffusion Secretly Models the Conditional Distributions of Clean Data · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Large Language Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Large Language Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance-reduced preference optimization · 1.0supervised fine-tuning · 1.0parallel decoding · 1.0reparameterization · 0.9masked token prediction · 0.9masked modeling · 0.9likelihood lower bound optimization · 0.9fréchet inception distance · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9concrete score · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DLLM-Searcher: Adapting Diffusion Language Model for Efficient Search AgentsabstractRecently, Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have demonstrated unique efficiency advantages, enabled by their inherently parallel decoding mechanism and flexible generation paradigm. Meanwhile, despite the rapid advancement of Search Agents, their practical deployment is constrained by a fundamental limitation, termed as 1) Latency Challenge : the serial execution of multi-round reasoning, tool calling, and tool response waiting under the ReAct agent paradigm induces severe end-to-end latency. Intuitively, dLLMs can leverage their distinctive strengths to optimize the operational efficiency of agents under the ReAct agent paradigm. Practically, existing dLLM backbones face the 2) Agent Ability Challenge. That is, existing dLLMs exhibit remarkably weak reasoning and tool-calling capabilities, preventing these advantages from being effectively realized in practice. In this paper, we propose DLLM-Searcher, an optimization framework for dLLM-based Search Agents. To solve the Agent Ability Challenge, we design a two-stage post-training pipeline encompassing Agentic Supervised Fine-Tuning (Agentic SFT) and Agentic Variance-Reduced Preference Optimization (Agentic VRPO), which enhances the backbone dLLM's information seeking and reasoning capabilities. To mitigate the Latency Challenge, we leverage the flexible generation mechanism of dLLMs and propose a novel agent paradigm termed Parallel-Reasoning and Acting (P-ReAct). P-ReAct guides the model to prioritize decoding tool_call instructions, thereby allowing the model to keep thinking while waiting for the tool's return. Experimental results demonstrate that DLLM-Searcher achieves performance comparable to mainstream LLM-based search agents and P-ReAct delivers approximately 15% inference acceleration. Our code is available at https://github.com/bubble65/DLLM-Searcher Jiahao Zhao 0002, Shaoxuan Xu, Zhongxiang Sun, Fengqi Zhu, Jingyang Ou, Yuling Shi, Chongxuan Li, Xiao Zhang 0034, Jun Xu 0001 |
SIGIR | 5 |
| 2025 | Your Absorbing Discrete Diffusion Secretly Models the Conditional Distributions of Clean DataabstractDiscrete diffusion models with absorbing processes have shown promise in language modeling. The key quantities to be estimated are the ratios between the marginal probabilities of two transitive states at all timesteps, called the concrete score. In this paper, we reveal that the concrete score in absorbing diffusion can be expressed as conditional probabilities of clean data, multiplied by a time-dependent scalar in an analytic form. Motivated by this finding, we propose reparameterized absorbing discrete diffusion (RADD), a dedicated diffusion model without time-condition that characterizes the time-independent conditional probabilities. Besides its simplicity, RADD can reduce the number of function evaluations (NFEs) by caching the output of the time-independent network when the noisy sample remains unchanged in a sampling interval, which enables sampling acceleration. Built upon the new perspective of conditional distributions, we further unify absorbing discrete diffusion and any-order autoregressive models (AO-ARMs), showing that the upper bound on the negative log-likelihood for the diffusion model can be interpreted as an expected negative log-likelihood for AO-ARMs. Further, our RADD models achieve SOTA performance among diffusion models on 5 zero-shot language modeling benchmarks (measured by perplexity) at the GPT-2 scale. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/ML-GSAI/RADD}. Jingyang Ou, Shen Nie, Fengqi Zhu, Zhenguo Li, Chongxuan Li |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Effective and Efficient Masked Image Generation ModelsabstractAlthough masked image generation models and masked diffusion models are designed with different motivations and objectives, we observe that they can be unified within a single framework. Building upon this insight, we carefully explore the design space of training and sampling, identifying key factors that contribute to both performance and efficiency. Based on the improvements observed during this exploration, we develop our model, referred to as \textbf{eMIGM}. Empirically, eMIGM demonstrates strong performance on ImageNet generation, as measured by Fréchet Inception Distance (FID). In particular, on ImageNet $256\times256$, with similar number of function evaluations (NFEs) and model parameters, eMIGM outperforms the seminal VAR. Moreover, as NFE and model parameters increase, eMIGM achieves performance comparable to the state-of-the-art continuous diffusion model REPA while requiring less than 45\% of the NFE. Additionally, on ImageNet $512\times512$, eMIGM outperforms the strong continuous diffusion model EDM2. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/ML-GSAI/eMIGM}. Zebin You, Jingyang Ou, Jun Zhou 0011, Chongxuan Li |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Large Language Diffusion ModelsabstractThe capabilities of large language models (LLMs) are widely regarded as relying on autoregressive models (ARMs). We challenge this notion by introducing *LLaDA*, a diffusion model trained from scratch under the pre-training and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) paradigm. LLaDA employs a forward data masking process and a reverse generation process, parameterized by a Transformer to predict masked tokens. It provides a principled generative approach for probabilistic inference by optimizing a likelihood lower bound. Across extensive benchmarks on general tasks, math, code, and so on, LLaDA demonstrates strong *scalability* and performs comparably to our self-constructed ARM baselines. Remarkably, LLaDA 8B is competitive with strong LLMs like LLaMA3 8B in *in-context learning* and, after SFT, exhibits impressive *instruction-following* abilities in case studies such as multi-turn dialogue. Moreover, LLaDA addresses the reversal curse, surpassing GPT-4o in a reversal poem completion task. Our findings show the promise of diffusion models for language modeling at scale and challenge the common assumption that core LLM capabilities discussed above inherently depend on ARMs. Project page and codes: \url{https://ml-gsai.github.io/LLaDA-demo/}. Shen Nie, Fengqi Zhu, Zebin You, Jingyang Ou, Jun Zhou 0011, Yankai Lin 0001, Ji-Rong Wen, Chongxuan Li |
NeurIPS | 5 |