EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philipp Misof
dblp:379/6650
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 64% Learning theory · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernels · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
group convolutional network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernels · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernels · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernels · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
equivariance |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Equivariant Neural Tangent Kernels · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel regression · 0.9group convolution · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Equivariant Neural Tangent KernelsabstractLittle is known about the training dynamics of equivariant neural networks, in particular how it compares to data augmented training of their non-equivariant counterparts. Recently, neural tangent kernels (NTKs) have emerged as a powerful tool to analytically study the training dynamics of wide neural networks. In this work, we take an important step towards a theoretical understanding of training dynamics of equivariant models by deriving neural tangent kernels for a broad class of equivariant architectures based on group convolutions. As a demonstration of the capabilities of our framework, we show an interesting relationship between data augmentation and group convolutional networks. Specifically, we prove that they share the same expected prediction over initializations at all training times and even off the data manifold. In this sense, they have the same training dynamics. We demonstrate in numerical experiments that this still holds approximately for finite-width ensembles. By implementing equivariant NTKs for roto-translations in the plane ($G=C_{n}\ltimes\mathbb{R}^{2}$) and 3d rotations ($G=\mathrm{SO}(3)$), we show that equivariant NTKs outperform their non-equivariant counterparts as kernel predictors for histological image classification and quantum mechanical property prediction. Philipp Misof, Pan Kessel, Jan E. Gerken |
ICML | 1 |