Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haijing Nan

dblp:379/8833 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6174-7891ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 67% Empirical software engineering · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
log analysis
0.912025
Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era · MobiSys 2025
Software maintenance and evolution › log analysis
log parsing
0.912025
Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era · MobiSys 2025
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.912025
Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era · MobiSys 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7flan-t5 embeddings · 1.7few-shot learning · 1.7determinantal point process sampling · 1.7TF-IDF · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era
abstract
In the field of software engineering, the automated analysis of log data is crucial for operations and maintenance teams. This study introduces LLMDPP, a novel log parser that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) and Determinantal Point Process (DPP) sampling techniques to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of online log parsing. LLMDPP transforms raw log messages into structured log templates through a few-shot learning, thus simplifying the processing and analysis of log data. The study explores the accuracy of LLMDPP in log-parsing tasks and compares the effectiveness of different encoding functions (TF-IDF and Flan-T5-small embedding layer) in DPP sampling. Experimental results show that LLMDPP outperforms traditional methods in both Global Accuracy and Parsing Accuracy, with the semantic information encoding function performing better when the number of samples is low. Furthermore, we simulate an online scenario to evaluate the parsing effectiveness of different sampling methods on unseen log datasets. The results indicate that the DPP sampling method has an advantage in maintaining sample diversity and fairness, which can improve parsing accuracy.
Siqin Zhang, Haijing Nan, Xueyu Hou, Jiaqi Zou, Zicong Miao
MobiSys3