Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haijing Nan
dblp:379/8833
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6174-7891ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 67% Empirical software engineering · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
log analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era · MobiSys 2025 |
Software maintenance and evolution › log analysis
log parsing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era · MobiSys 2025 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM Era · MobiSys 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7flan-t5 embeddings · 1.7few-shot learning · 1.7determinantal point process sampling · 1.7TF-IDF · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Empirical Analysis of LLMDPP: Advancing Log Parsing in the LLM EraabstractIn the field of software engineering, the automated analysis of log data is crucial for operations and maintenance teams. This study introduces LLMDPP, a novel log parser that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) and Determinantal Point Process (DPP) sampling techniques to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of online log parsing. LLMDPP transforms raw log messages into structured log templates through a few-shot learning, thus simplifying the processing and analysis of log data. The study explores the accuracy of LLMDPP in log-parsing tasks and compares the effectiveness of different encoding functions (TF-IDF and Flan-T5-small embedding layer) in DPP sampling. Experimental results show that LLMDPP outperforms traditional methods in both Global Accuracy and Parsing Accuracy, with the semantic information encoding function performing better when the number of samples is low. Furthermore, we simulate an online scenario to evaluate the parsing effectiveness of different sampling methods on unseen log datasets. The results indicate that the DPP sampling method has an advantage in maintaining sample diversity and fairness, which can improve parsing accuracy. Siqin Zhang, Haijing Nan, Xueyu Hou, Jiaqi Zou, Zicong Miao |
MobiSys | 3 |