Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samantha J. Riesenfeld

dblp:38/10995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0001-9144-021XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 6Computer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 54% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 36% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 5%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 50% Network optimization and economics · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › partial orders
linear extensions
0.222011
Sorting and Selection in Posets · SIAM J. Comput. 2011
Sorting and selection in posets · SODA 2009
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
partial orders
0.222011
Sorting and Selection in Posets · SIAM J. Comput. 2011
Sorting and selection in posets · SODA 2009
Algorithms and data structures
selection
0.222011
Sorting and Selection in Posets · SIAM J. Comput. 2011
Sorting and selection in posets · SODA 2009
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
sorting
0.222011
Sorting and Selection in Posets · SIAM J. Comput. 2011
Sorting and selection in posets · SODA 2009
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › sorting › comparison sorting
sorting under partial information
0.222011
Sorting and Selection in Posets · SIAM J. Comput. 2011
Sorting and selection in posets · SODA 2009
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.112006
A Push-Relabel Algorithm for Approximating Degree Bounded MSTs · ICALP (1) 2006
Graph algorithms and graph theory › spanning tree
minimum spanning tree
0.112006
A Push-Relabel Algorithm for Approximating Degree Bounded MSTs · ICALP (1) 2006
Network optimization and economics › network design › network planning
base station deployment
0.012004
Power-aware base station positioning for sensor networks · INFOCOM 2004
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.012004
Power-aware base station positioning for sensor networks · INFOCOM 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mergesort · 0.2query complexity lower bounds · 0.1query complexity · 0.1push-relabel algorithm · 0.1simulation · 0.0maximum flow · 0.0NP-completeness analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 PhylOTU: A High-Throughput Procedure Quantifies Microbial Community Diversity and Resolves Novel Taxa from Metagenomic Data
abstract
Microbial diversity is typically characterized by clustering ribosomal RNA (SSU-rRNA) sequences into operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Targeted sequencing of environmental SSU-rRNA markers via PCR may fail to detect OTUs due to biases in priming and amplification. Analysis of shotgun sequenced environmental DNA, known as metagenomics, avoids amplification bias but generates fragmentary, non-overlapping sequence reads that cannot be clustered by existing OTU-finding methods. To circumvent these limitations, we developed PhylOTU, a computational workflow that identifies OTUs from metagenomic SSU-rRNA sequence data through the use of phylogenetic principles and probabilistic sequence profiles. Using simulated metagenomic data, we quantified the accuracy with which PhylOTU clusters reads into OTUs. Comparisons of PCR and shotgun sequenced SSU-rRNA markers derived from the global open ocean revealed that while PCR libraries identify more OTUs per sequenced residue, metagenomic libraries recover a greater taxonomic diversity of OTUs. In addition, we discover novel species, genera and families in the metagenomic libraries, including OTUs from phyla missed by analysis of PCR sequences. Taken together, these results suggest that PhylOTU enables characterization of part of the biosphere currently hidden from PCR-based surveys of diversity?
Thomas J. Sharpton, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Steven W. Kembel, Joshua Ladau, James P. O'Dwyer, Jessica L. Green, Jonathan A. Eisen, Katherine S. Pollard
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2011 Sorting and Selection in Posets
abstract
Classical problems of sorting and searching assume an underlying linear ordering of the objects being compared. In this paper, we study these problems in the context of partially ordered sets, in which some pairs of objects are incomparable. This generalization is interesting from a combinatorial perspective, and it has immediate applications in ranking scenarios where there is no underlying linear ordering, e.g., conference submissions. It also has applications in reconstructing certain types of networks, including biological networks. Our results represent significant progress over previous results from two decades ago by Faigle and Turán. In particular, we present the first algorithm that sorts a width-w poset of size n with query complexity $O(n(w+\log n))$ and prove that this query complexity is asymptotically optimal. We also describe a variant of Mergesort with query complexity $O(wn\log\frac{n}{w})$ and total complexity $O(w^{2}n\log\frac{n}{w})$; an algorithm with the same query complexity was given by Faigle and Turán, but no efficient implementation of that algorithm is known. Both our sorting algorithms can be applied with negligible overhead to the more general problem of reconstructing transitive relations. We also consider two related problems: finding the minimal elements, and its generalization to finding the bottom k “levels,” called the k-selection problem. We give efficient deterministic and randomized algorithms for finding the minimal elements with query complexity and total complexity $O(wn)$. We provide matching lower bounds for the query complexity up to a factor of 2 and generalize the results to the k-selection problem. Finally, we present efficient algorithms for computing a linear extension of a poset and computing the heights of all elements.
Constantinos Daskalakis, Richard M. Karp, Elchanan Mossel, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Elad Verbin
SIAM J. Comput.4
2009 Sorting and selection in posets
abstract
Classical problems of sorting and searching assume an underlying linear ordering of the objects being compared. In this paper, we study these problems in the context of partially ordered sets, in which some pairs of objects are incomparable. This generalization is interesting from a combinatorial perspective, and it has immediate applications in ranking scenarios where there is no underlying linear ordering, e.g., conference submissions. It also has applications in reconstructing certain types of networks, including biological networks. Our results represent significant progress over previous results from two decades ago by Faigle and Turán. In particular, we present the first algorithm that sorts a width-w poset of size n with optimal query complexity O(n(w + log n)). We also describe a variant of Mergesort with query complexity and total complexity ; an algorithm with the same query complexity was given by Faigle and Turán, but no efficient implementation of that algorithm is known. Both our sorting algorithms can be applied with negligible overhead to the more general problem of reconstructing transitive relations. We also consider two related problems: finding the minimal elements, and its generalization to finding the bottom k “levels”, called the k-selection problem. We give efficient deterministic and randomized algorithms for finding the minimal elements with O(wn) query and total complexity. We provide matching lower bounds for the query complexity up to a factor of 2 and generalize the results to the k-selection problem. Finally, we present efficient algorithms for computing a linear extension of a poset and computing the heights of all elements.
Constantinos Daskalakis, Richard M. Karp, Elchanan Mossel, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Elad Verbin
SODA4
2009 What Would Edmonds Do? Augmenting Paths and Witnesses for Degree-Bounded MSTs
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Satish Rao, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Kunal Talwar
Algorithmica3
2009 A push-relabel approximation algorithm for approximating the minimum-degree MST problem and its generalization to matroids
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Satish Rao, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Kunal Talwar
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2006 A Push-Relabel Algorithm for Approximating Degree Bounded MSTs
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Satish Rao, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Kunal Talwar
ICALP (1)3
2005 What Would Edmonds Do? Augmenting Paths and Witnesses for Degree-Bounded MSTs
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Satish Rao, Samantha J. Riesenfeld, Kunal Talwar
APPROX-RANDOM3
2004 Power-aware base station positioning for sensor networks
abstract
We consider the problem of positioning data collecting base stations in a sensor network. We show that in general, the choice of positions has a marked influence on the data rate, or equivalently, the power efficiency, of the network. In our model, which is partly motivated by an experimental environmental monitoring system, the optimum data rate for a fixed layout of base stations can be found by a maximum flow algorithm. Finding the optimum layout of base stations, however, turns out to be an NP-complete problem, even in the special case of homogeneous networks. Our analysis of the optimum layout for the special case of the regular grid shows that all layouts that meet certain constraints are equally good. We also consider two classes of random graphs, chosen to model networks that might be realistically encountered, and empirically evaluate the performance of several base station positioning algorithms on instances of these classes. In comparison to manually choosing positions along the periphery of the network or randomly choosing them within the network, the algorithms tested find positions, which significantly improve the data rate and power efficiency of the network.
Andrej Bogdanov, Elitza N. Maneva, Samantha J. Riesenfeld
INFOCOM3