Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haruyuki Ohkuma
dblp:38/2080
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 50% Energy-efficient computing · 25% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Phase-adjustable error detection flip-flops with 2-stage hold driven optimization and slack based grouping scheme for dynamic voltage scaling · DAC 2008 |
Energy-efficient computing › voltage scaling
dynamic voltage scaling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Phase-adjustable error detection flip-flops with 2-stage hold driven optimization and slack based grouping scheme for dynamic voltage scaling · DAC 2008 |
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Phase-adjustable error detection flip-flops with 2-stage hold driven optimization and slack based grouping scheme for dynamic voltage scaling · DAC 2008 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error detection
timing error detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Phase-adjustable error detection flip-flops with 2-stage hold driven optimization and slack based grouping scheme for dynamic voltage scaling · DAC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
slack-based grouping · 0.1phase adjustment · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Phase-adjustable error detection flip-flops with 2-stage hold-driven optimization, slack-based grouping scheme and slack distribution control for dynamic voltage scalingabstractFor Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS), we propose a novel design methodology. This methodology is composed of an error detection circuit and three technologies to reduce the area and power penalties which are the large issues for the conventional DVS with error detection. The proposed circuit, Phase-Adjustable Error Detection Flip-Flip (PEDFF), adjusts the clock phase of an additional FF for the timing error detection, based on the timing slack. 2-Stage Hold-Driven Optimization (2-SHDO) technology splits the hold-driven optimization in two stages. Slack-Based Grouping Scheme (SBGS) technology divides each timing path into appropriate groups based on the timing slack. Slack Distribution Control (SDC) technology improves the sharp distribution of the path delay at which the logic synthesis tool has relaxed the delay. We evaluate the methodology by simulating a 32-bit microprocessor in 90 nm CMOS technology. The proposed methodology reduces the energy consumption by 19.8% compared to non-DVS. The OR-tree's latency is shortened to 16.3% compared to the conventional DVS. The area and power penalties for delay buffers on short paths are reduced to 35.0% and 40.6% compared to the conventional DVS, respectively. The proposed methodology with SDC reduces the energy consumption by 17.0% on another example with the sharp slack distribution by the logic synthesis compared to non-DVS. Masanori Kurimoto, Hiroaki Suzuki, Rei Akiyama, Tadao Yamanaka, Haruyuki Ohkuma, Hidehiro Takata, Hirofumi Shinohara |
ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst. | 5 |
| 2008 | Phase-adjustable error detection flip-flops with 2-stage hold driven optimization and slack based grouping scheme for dynamic voltage scalingabstractError Detection FFs for Dynamic Voltage Scaling (DVS) has been proposed. This technique controls the clock phase based on the timing slack, and reduces the energy consumption by 19.8% compared to non-DVS. The error signal latency is shortened to 6.3%, the area and power penalties for delay buffers on short paths become 35.0% and 40.6% lower compared to the conventional DVS. Masanori Kurimoto, Hiroaki Suzuki, Rei Akiyama, Tadao Yamanaka, Haruyuki Ohkuma, Hidehiro Takata, Hirofumi Shinohara |
DAC | 5 |