Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siw Elisabeth Hove

dblp:38/2517 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software documentation
0.112006
The Impact of UML Documentation on Software Maintenance: An Experimental Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2006
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.012006
The Impact of UML Documentation on Software Maintenance: An Experimental Evaluation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 The Impact of UML Documentation on Software Maintenance: An Experimental Evaluation
abstract
The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is becoming the de facto standard for software analysis and design modeling. However, there is still significant resistance to model-driven development in many software organizations because it is perceived to be expensive and not necessarily cost-effective. Hence, it is important to investigate the benefits obtained from modeling. As a first step in this direction, this paper reports on controlled experiments, spanning two locations, that investigate the impact of UML documentation on software maintenance. Results show that, for complex tasks and past a certain learning curve, the availability of UML documentation may result in significant improvements in the functional correctness of changes as well as the quality of their design. However, there does not seem to be any saving of time. For simpler tasks, the time needed to update the UML documentation may be substantial compared with the potential benefits, thus motivating the need for UML tools with better support for software maintenance
Erik Arisholm, Lionel C. Briand, Siw Elisabeth Hove, Yvan Labiche
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
2005 Collecting Feedback during Software Engineering Experiments
Amela Karahasanovic, Bente Anda, Erik Arisholm, Siw Elisabeth Hove, Magne Jørgensen, Dag I. K. Sjøberg, Ray Welland
Empir. Softw. Eng.4
2004 Does Use of Development Model Affect Estimation Accuracy and Bias?
Kjetil Moløkken-Østvold, Anette C. Lien, Magne Jørgensen, Sinan Sigurd Tanilkan, Hans Gallis, Siw Elisabeth Hove
PROFES6