Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fusun Yaman

dblp:38/3765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
19ranked-venue papers
11as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 11 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Computer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 62% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 31% Robot manipulation · 8%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 64% Logic in computer science · 36%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Empirical software engineering · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
synthetic biology
0.312018
AI Challenges in Synthetic Biology Engineering · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling › preference reasoning
lexicographic preference models
0.222011
Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models · Artif. Intell. 2011
Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models · ICML 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical planning
hierarchical task network
0.212013
Temporal Milestones in HTNs · AAAI 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
temporal reasoning
0.212013
Temporal Milestones in HTNs · AAAI 2013
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
preference aggregation
0.112011
Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models · Artif. Intell. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems
0.112018
AI Challenges in Synthetic Biology Engineering · AAAI 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › task automation
laboratory automation
0.112018
AI Challenges in Synthetic Biology Engineering · AAAI 2018
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.112009
A Context Driven Approach for Workflow Mining · IJCAI 2009
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling
preference modeling
0.112008
Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models · ICML 2008
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.112008
Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models · ICML 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game playing
computer go
0.112007
Probabilistic Go Theories · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game playing
0.112007
Probabilistic Go Theories · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning
closed world assumption
0.112005
A Motion Closed World Asumption · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.112005
A Motion Closed World Asumption · IJCAI 2005
Logic in computer science
modal logic
0.112005
Going Far, Logically · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge extraction
0.012013
A Morphogenetically Assisted Design Variation Tool · AAAI 2013
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative spatial reasoning
0.012004
A Logic of Motion · KR 2004
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › knowledge-based planning
case-based planning
0.012001
SiN: Integrating Case-based Reasoning with Task Decomposition · IJCAI 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
case-based reasoning
0.012001
SiN: Integrating Case-based Reasoning with Task Decomposition · IJCAI 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
0.012001
SiN: Integrating Case-based Reasoning with Task Decomposition · IJCAI 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical problem solving
task decomposition
0.012001
SiN: Integrating Case-based Reasoning with Task Decomposition · IJCAI 2001
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
process modeling
0.012009
A Context Driven Approach for Workflow Mining · IJCAI 2009
Logic in computer science
semantics
0.012005
Going Far, Logically · IJCAI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robotics · 0.7machine learning · 0.7expert system · 0.7constraint solving · 0.3landmark variables · 0.2hierarchical task networks · 0.2voting · 0.2learning bias · 0.2context-driven approach · 0.1task decomposition · 0.0case-based reasoning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Nudging Automated Planners with Learned User Preferences
Fusun Yaman, Thomas C. Eskridge, Ron Scott, Jeff Miller, Daniel Carpenter
ICAART (3)1
2020 An Autonomous Resiliency Toolkit for Cyber Defense Platforms
Fusun Yaman, Thomas C. Eskridge, Aaron Adler, Michael Atighetchi, Borislava I. Simidchieva, Sarah Jeter, Jennifer Cassetti, Jeffrey DeMatteis
ICAART (2)1
2018 AI Challenges in Synthetic Biology Engineering
abstract
A wide variety of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, from expert systems to machine learning to robotics, are needed in the field of synthetic biology. This paper describes the design-build-test engineering cycle and lists some challenges in which AI can help.
Fusun Yaman, Aaron Adler, Jacob Beal
AAAI1
2013 A Morphogenetically Assisted Design Variation Tool
abstract
The complexity and tight integration of electromechanical systems often makes them "brittle" and hard to modify in response to changing requirements. We aim to remedy this by capturing expert knowledge as functional blueprints, an idea inspired by regulatory processes that occur in natural morphogenesis. We then apply this knowledge in an intelligent design variation tool. When a user modifies a design, our tool uses functional blueprints to modify other components in response, thereby maintaining integration and reducing the need for costly search or constraint solving. In this paper, we refine the functional blueprint concept and discuss practical issues in applying it to electromechanical systems. We then validate our approach with a case study applying our prototype tool to create variants of a miniDroid robot and by empirical evaluation of convergence dynamics of networks of functional blueprints.
Aaron Adler, Fusun Yaman, Jacob Beal, Jeffrey Cleveland, Hala Mostafa, Annan Mozeika
AAAI2
2013 Temporal Milestones in HTNs
abstract
We present temporal milestones for hierarchical task networks to enable the complex synchronization of tasks. A temporal milestone of a task is an intermediate event that occurs during the execution of a complex task, e.g., the start time, the end time or a milestone of any of its subtasks. Unlike landmark variables, introduced in existing work, temporal milestones respect the task abstraction boundaries and preserve structural properties enabling much more efficient reasoning. Furthermore, temporal milestones are as expressive as landmark variables. We provide analytical and empirical evidence to support these claims.
Fusun Yaman, Brett Benyo, Alice M. Mulvehill
AAAI1
2013 Leveraging Historical Experience to Evaluate and Adapt Courses of Action
Alice M. Mulvehill, Brett Benyo, Fusun Yaman
ICCBR3
2011 Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models
Fusun Yaman, Thomas J. Walsh 0001, Michael L. Littman, Marie desJardins
Artif. Intell.1
2011 RECYCLE: Learning looping workflows from annotated traces
abstract
A workflow is a model of a process that systematically describes patterns of activity. Workflows capture a sequence of operations, their enablement conditions, and data flow dependencies among them. It is hard to design a complete and correct workflow from scratch, while it is much easier for humans to demonstrate the solution than to state the solution declaratively. This article presents RECYCLE, our approach to learning workflow models from example demonstration traces. RECYCLE captures control flow, data flow, and enablement conditions of an underlying workflow process. Unlike prior work from workflow mining and AI planning literature, (1) RECYCLE can learn from a single demonstration trace with loops, (2) RECYCLE learns both loop and conditional branch structure, and (3) RECYCLE handles data flow among actions. In this article, we describe the phases of RECYCLE's learning algorithm: substructure analysis and node abstraction. To ground the discussion, we present a simplified flight reservation system with some of the important characteristics of the real domains we worked with. We present some results from a patient transport domain.
Karen Zita Haigh, Fusun Yaman
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.2
2009 A Context Driven Approach for Workflow Mining
Fusun Yaman, Tim Oates 0001, Mark H. Burstein
IJCAI1
2009 POIROT: acquiring workflows by combining models learned from interpreted traces
abstract
The POIROT project is a four-year effort to develop an architecture that integrates the products of a number of targeted reasoning and learning components to produce executable representations of demonstrated web service workflow processes. To do this it combines contributions from multiple trace analysis (interpretation) and learning methods guided by a meta-control regime that reviews explicit learning hypotheses and posts new learning goals and internal learning subtasks. POIROT's meta-controller guides the activity of its components through largely distinct phases of processing from trace interpretation, to inductive learning, hypotheses combination and experimental evaluation. In this paper we discuss the impact that various kinds of inference during the trace interpretation phase can have on the quality of the learned models.
Mark H. Burstein, Fusun Yaman, Robert Laddaga, Robert J. Bobrow
K-CAP2
2008 Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models
abstract
Previous algorithms for learning lexicographic preference models (LPMs) produce a "best guess" LPM that is consistent with the observations. Our approach is more democratic: we do not commit to a single LPM. Instead, we approximate the target using the votes of a collection of consistent LPMs. We present two variations of this method---variable voting and model voting---and empirically show that these democratic algorithms outperform the existing methods. We also introduce an intuitive yet powerful learning bias to prune some of the possible LPMs. We demonstrate how this learning bias can be used with variable and model voting and show that the learning bias improves the learning curve significantly, especially when the number of observations is small.
Fusun Yaman, Thomas J. Walsh 0001, Michael L. Littman, Marie desJardins
ICML1
2007 Probabilistic Go Theories
Austin Parker, Fusun Yaman, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
IJCAI2
2007 More-or-Less CP-Networks
Fusun Yaman, Marie desJardins
UAI1
2005 Going Far, Logically
Fusun Yaman, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
IJCAI1
2005 A Motion Closed World Asumption
Fusun Yaman, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
IJCAI1
2004 A Logic of Motion
Fusun Yaman, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
KR1
2003 SHOP2: An HTN Planning System
abstract
The SHOP2 planning system received one of the awards for distinguished performance in the 2002 International Planning Competition. This paper describes the features of SHOP2 which enabled it to excel in the competition, especially those aspects of SHOP2 that deal with temporal and metric planning domains.
Dana S. Nau, Tsz-Chiu Au, Okhtay Ilghami, Ugur Kuter, J. William Murdock, Fusun Yaman
J. Artif. Intell. Res.7
2002 Security-Aware Adaptive Dynamic Source Routing Protoco
abstract
We present SADSR (security-aware adaptive DSR), a secure routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. SADSR authenticates the routing protocol messages using digital signatures based on asymmetric cryptography. The basic idea behind SADSR is to have multiple routes to each destination and store a local trust value for each node in the network. A trust value is assigned to each path based on trust values of the nodes which occur on that path. The paths with higher trust values are preferred for routing. We implemented our approach in ns2 simulator and compared the performance of SADSR and DSR. Our results show that in the presence of malicious nodes SADSR outperforms DSR in packet delivery ratio with an acceptable network load.
Shayan Ghazizadeh, Okhtay Ilghami, Evren Sirin, Fusun Yaman
LCN4
2001 SiN: Integrating Case-based Reasoning with Task Decomposition
Hector Muñoz-Avila, David W. Aha, Dana S. Nau, Rosina O. Weber, Len Breslow, Fusun Yaman
IJCAI6