Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Angela C. Higdon

dblp:38/4126 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 67% Image and video coding · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
image quality assessment		 0.011995
Perceptual evaluation of the mean-square error choice of regularization parameter · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995
Image and video processing
image restoration		 0.011995
Perceptual evaluation of the mean-square error choice of regularization parameter · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995
Image and video processing › regularization
regularization parameter estimation		 0.011995
Perceptual evaluation of the mean-square error choice of regularization parameter · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perceptual study · 0.0mean-square error · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Perceptual evaluation of the mean-square error choice of regularization parameter
abstract
A formal perceptual study shows that the perceptually optimal choice of regularization parameter varies from the minimum mean-square error parameter as a function of the original image, the point-spread function, and the signal-to noise ratio (SNR). However, further studies show that this variation has only a slight effect on the perceived quality of the restoration.
Stanley J. Reeves, Angela C. Higdon
 IEEE Trans. Image Process.2