Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mario Marino

dblp:38/4479 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 91% Performance modeling and evaluation · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
atomic block execution
0.112009
An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system · ASPLOS 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
dataflow architecture
0.112009
An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system · ASPLOS 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture
0.112009
An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system · ASPLOS 2009
Performance modeling and evaluation › system-level analysis › architecture evaluation
processor performance evaluation
0.012009
An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system · ASPLOS 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cycle-count benchmarking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 An evaluation of the TRIPS computer system
abstract
The TRIPS system employs a new instruction set architecture (ISA) called Explicit Data Graph Execution (EDGE) that renegotiates the boundary between hardware and software to expose and exploit concurrency. EDGE ISAs use a block-atomic execution model in which blocks are composed of dataflow instructions. The goal of the TRIPS design is to mine concurrency for high performance while tolerating emerging technology scaling challenges, such as increasing wire delays and power consumption. This paper evaluates how well TRIPS meets this goal through a detailed ISA and performance analysis. We compare performance, using cycles counts, to commercial processors. On SPEC CPU2000, the Intel Core 2 outperforms compiled TRIPS code in most cases, although TRIPS matches a Pentium 4. On simple benchmarks, compiled TRIPS code outperforms the Core 2 by 10% and hand-optimized TRIPS code outperforms it by factor of 3. Compared to conventional ISAs, the block-atomic model provides a larger instruction window, increases concurrency at a cost of more instructions executed, and replaces register and memory accesses with more efficient direct instruction-to-instruction communication. Our analysis suggests ISA, microarchitecture, and compiler enhancements for addressing weaknesses in TRIPS and indicates that EDGE architectures have the potential to exploit greater concurrency in future technologies.
Mark Gebhart, Bertrand A. Maher, Katherine E. Coons, Jeffrey R. Diamond, Paul Gratz, Mario Marino, Nitya Ranganathan, Behnam Robatmili, Aaron Smith, James H. Burrill, Stephen W. Keckler, Doug Burger, Kathryn S. McKinley
ASPLOS6
2008 Generalized Gagliardo-Nirenberg estimates and differentiability of the solutions to monotone nonlinear parabolic systems
Mario Marino, Antonino Maugeri
J. Glob. Optim.1