Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Egino Sarto
dblp:38/4659
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 83% Integrated circuit design · 17% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › system-level design
chip-package co-design |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006 |
Electronic design automation
interconnect modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On switch factor based analysis of coupled RC interconnects · DAC 2000 |
Electronic design automation
timing analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On switch factor based analysis of coupled RC interconnects · DAC 2000 |
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006 |
Integrated circuit design
interconnect |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simultaneous interconnect synthesis · 0.1rank-one update · 0.0model order reduction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Constraint driven I/O planning and placement for chip-package co-designabstractSystem-on-chip and system-in-package result in increased number of I/O cells and complicated constraints for both chip designs and package designs. This renders the traditional manually tuned and chip-centered I/O designs suboptimal in terms of both turn around time and design quality. In this paper, we formally introduce a set of design constraints suitable for chip-package co-design. We formulate a constraint-driven I/O planning and placement problem, and solve it by a multi-step algorithm based upon integer linear programming. Experiment results using real industry designs show that the proposed algorithm can effectively find a large scale I/O placement solution and satisfy all given design constraints in less than 10 minutes. In contrast, the state-of-the-art without considering those design constraints simply cannot meet all design constraints by relying solely upon the conventional iterative approach Jinjun Xiong, Yiu-Chung Wong, Egino Sarto, Lei He 0001 |
ASP-DAC | 3 |
| 2006 | The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flowabstractIn this paper, we talk about the short- and long-term implications of ignoring the relationship between the chip, package and PCB during I/O planning and how these issues will manifest themselves as we move toward 65 and 45nm technology.It also introduces a whole new approach to chip/package I/O planning and optimization. This new approach simultaneously synthesizes the entire interconnect from the I/O driver to the package ball and establishes an interconnect plan that is optimized for both chip and package. Kaushik Sheth, Egino Sarto, Joel McGrath |
DAC | 2 |
| 2000 | On switch factor based analysis of coupled RC interconnectsabstractIn this paper we presen t a rank-one update method for updating reduced-order models of interconnect parasitics when driv e resistances or load capacitances change, as commonly occurs during timing analysis. These rank-one updates are extremely inexpensive, do not require reexamining the original in terconnect netw ork, and most importantly are provably equivalent to rereducing the original netw ork. This abstract contains the proof only for the case of varying the driver resistance, but examples are given to sho w that the exactness holds more generally. In particular, a cross-talk case is examined where the conductance matrix is singular. Andrew B. Kahng, Sudhakar Muddu, Egino Sarto |
DAC | 3 |
| 1998 | Interconnect Tuning Strategies for High-Performance IcsabstractInterconnect tuning is an increasingly critical degree of freedom in the physical design of high-performance VLSI systems. By interconnect tuning, we refer to the selection of line thicknesses, widths and spacings in multi-layer interconnect to simultaneously optimize signal distribution, signal performance, signal integrity, and interconnect manufacturability and reliability. This is a key activity in most leading-edge design projects, but has received little attention in the literature. Our work provides the first technology-specific studies of interconnect tuning in the literature. We center on global wiring layers and interconnect tuning issues related to bus routing, repeater insertion, and choice of shielding/spacing rules for signal integrity and performance. We address four basic questions. (1) How should width and spacing be allocated to maximize performance for a given line pitch? (2) For a given line pitch, what criteria affect the optimal interval at which repeaters should be inserted into global interconnects? (3) Under what circumstances are shield wires the optimum technique for improving interconnect performance? (4) In global interconnect with repeaters, what other interconnect tuning is possible? Our study of question (4) demonstrates a new approach of offsetting repeater placements that can reduce worst-case cross-chip delays by over 30% in current technologies. Andrew B. Kahng, Sudhakar Muddu, Egino Sarto |
DATE | 3 |