Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Egino Sarto

dblp:38/4659 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 83% Integrated circuit design · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › system-level design
chip-package co-design
0.112006
The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.112006
The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006
Electronic design automation
interconnect modeling
0.012000
On switch factor based analysis of coupled RC interconnects · DAC 2000
Electronic design automation
timing analysis
0.012000
On switch factor based analysis of coupled RC interconnects · DAC 2000
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design
0.012006
The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006
Integrated circuit design
interconnect
0.012006
The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow · DAC 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simultaneous interconnect synthesis · 0.1rank-one update · 0.0model order reduction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Constraint driven I/O planning and placement for chip-package co-design
abstract
System-on-chip and system-in-package result in increased number of I/O cells and complicated constraints for both chip designs and package designs. This renders the traditional manually tuned and chip-centered I/O designs suboptimal in terms of both turn around time and design quality. In this paper, we formally introduce a set of design constraints suitable for chip-package co-design. We formulate a constraint-driven I/O planning and placement problem, and solve it by a multi-step algorithm based upon integer linear programming. Experiment results using real industry designs show that the proposed algorithm can effectively find a large scale I/O placement solution and satisfy all given design constraints in less than 10 minutes. In contrast, the state-of-the-art without considering those design constraints simply cannot meet all design constraints by relying solely upon the conventional iterative approach
Jinjun Xiong, Yiu-Chung Wong, Egino Sarto, Lei He 0001
ASP-DAC3
2006 The importance of adopting a package-aware chip design flow
abstract
In this paper, we talk about the short- and long-term implications of ignoring the relationship between the chip, package and PCB during I/O planning and how these issues will manifest themselves as we move toward 65 and 45nm technology.It also introduces a whole new approach to chip/package I/O planning and optimization. This new approach simultaneously synthesizes the entire interconnect from the I/O driver to the package ball and establishes an interconnect plan that is optimized for both chip and package.
Kaushik Sheth, Egino Sarto, Joel McGrath
DAC2
2000 On switch factor based analysis of coupled RC interconnects
abstract
In this paper we presen t a rank-one update method for updating reduced-order models of interconnect parasitics when driv e resistances or load capacitances change, as commonly occurs during timing analysis. These rank-one updates are extremely inexpensive, do not require reexamining the original in terconnect netw ork, and most importantly are provably equivalent to rereducing the original netw ork. This abstract contains the proof only for the case of varying the driver resistance, but examples are given to sho w that the exactness holds more generally. In particular, a cross-talk case is examined where the conductance matrix is singular.
Andrew B. Kahng, Sudhakar Muddu, Egino Sarto
DAC3
1998 Interconnect Tuning Strategies for High-Performance Ics
abstract
Interconnect tuning is an increasingly critical degree of freedom in the physical design of high-performance VLSI systems. By interconnect tuning, we refer to the selection of line thicknesses, widths and spacings in multi-layer interconnect to simultaneously optimize signal distribution, signal performance, signal integrity, and interconnect manufacturability and reliability. This is a key activity in most leading-edge design projects, but has received little attention in the literature. Our work provides the first technology-specific studies of interconnect tuning in the literature. We center on global wiring layers and interconnect tuning issues related to bus routing, repeater insertion, and choice of shielding/spacing rules for signal integrity and performance. We address four basic questions. (1) How should width and spacing be allocated to maximize performance for a given line pitch? (2) For a given line pitch, what criteria affect the optimal interval at which repeaters should be inserted into global interconnects? (3) Under what circumstances are shield wires the optimum technique for improving interconnect performance? (4) In global interconnect with repeaters, what other interconnect tuning is possible? Our study of question (4) demonstrates a new approach of offsetting repeater placements that can reduce worst-case cross-chip delays by over 30% in current technologies.
Andrew B. Kahng, Sudhakar Muddu, Egino Sarto
DATE3