Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Margaret Montenyohl

dblp:38/5016 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Program analysis · 26% Programming languages and type systems · 24%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
static analysis
0.011989
Incorporating Static Analysis in a Combinator-Based Compiler · Inf. Comput. 1989
Compilers and program optimization
code generation
0.011988
Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics · POPL 1988
Compilers and program optimization
compiler correctness
0.011988
Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics · POPL 1988
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics › denotational semantics
continuation semantics
0.011988
Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics · POPL 1988
Program analysis
flow analysis
0.011988
Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics · POPL 1988
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
semantics-preserving transformation
0.011988
Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics · POPL 1988
Programming languages and type systems
type checking
0.011988
Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics · POPL 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static replacement · 0.0factoring · 0.0combinator selection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Towards Efficient Compilation of a Dynamic Object-Oriented Language
Sheila Harnett, Margaret Montenyohl
PEPM2
1991 Correctness of Static Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics
Margaret Montenyohl, Mitchell Wand
Sci. Comput. Program.1
1989 Incorporating Static Analysis in a Combinator-Based Compiler
Margaret Montenyohl, Mitchell Wand
Inf. Comput.1
1988 Correct Flow Analysis in Continuation Semantics
abstract
Three semantics-preserving transformations (static replacement, factoring, and combinator selection) are used to convert a continuation semantics into a formal description of a semantic analyzer and code generator. The result of this derivation is a compilation algorithm which performs type checking before code generation so that type-checking instructions are not generated in the target code. Both the flow analysis and the resulting optimizations are proved correct with respect to the original definition of the source language. The proof consists of showing that all restructuring transformations preserve the semantics of the source language. This transformational approach can be extended to derive correctness proofs of other flow analysis and code optimization techniques.
Margaret Montenyohl, Mitchell Wand
POPL1