Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kim Chen

dblp:38/5081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Interaction techniques and input · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › information seeking
information scent
0.012001
Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web · CHI 2001
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.012001
Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web · CHI 2001
Interaction techniques and input › spatial interaction › navigation
web navigation
0.012001
Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web · CHI 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical evaluation · 0.1computational modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web
abstract
On the Web, users typically forage for information by navigating from page to page along Web links. Their surfing patterns or actions are guided by their information needs. Researchers need tools to explore the complex interactions between user needs, user actions, and the structures and contents of the Web. In this paper, we describe two computational methods for understanding the relationship between user needs and user actions. First, for a particular pattern of surfing, we seek to infer the associated information need. Second, given an information need, and some pages as starting pints, we attempt to predict the expected surfing patterns. The algorithms use a concept called “information scent”, which is the subjective sense of value and cost of accessing a page based on perceptual cues. We present an empirical evaluation of these two algorithms, and show their effectiveness.
Ed H. Chi, Peter Pirolli, Kim Chen, James E. Pitkow
CHI3