Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eleni Drinea

dblp:38/5553 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Information theory · 57% Coding theory · 35% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 4%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory
channel capacity
0.342010
Directly lower bounding the information capacity for channels with I.I.D.deletions and duplications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Improved Lower Bounds for the Capacity of i.i.d. Deletion and Duplication Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
A Simple Lower Bound for the Capacity of the Deletion Channel · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Coding theory
channel coding
0.122007
Improved Lower Bounds for the Capacity of i.i.d. Deletion and Duplication Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
On Lower Bounds for the Capacity of Deletion Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Information theory › channel capacity › deletion channel
binary deletion channel
0.112010
Directly lower bounding the information capacity for channels with I.I.D.deletions and duplications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
insertion-deletion codes
0.112007
Improved Lower Bounds for the Capacity of i.i.d. Deletion and Duplication Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2007
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › code construction
codebook design
0.112006
On Lower Bounds for the Capacity of Deletion Channels · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Information theory › channel capacity
deletion channel
0.112006
A Simple Lower Bound for the Capacity of the Deletion Channel · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › insertion and deletion
insertion-deletion channel
0.112006
A Simple Lower Bound for the Capacity of the Deletion Channel · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes
0.012002
Balls and bins models with feedback · SODA 2002
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
balls and bins
0.012002
Balls and bins models with feedback · SODA 2002
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
probabilistic combinatorics
0.012002
Balls and bins models with feedback · SODA 2002
Information theory › channel capacity
capacity bounds
0.012010
Directly lower bounding the information capacity for channels with I.I.D.deletions and duplications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Information theory › probability theory › stochastic processes › point processes
renewal theory
0.012010
Directly lower bounding the information capacity for channels with I.I.D.deletions and duplications · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

typicality · 0.1renewal theory · 0.1random coding · 0.1probabilistic analysis · 0.1markov chain codebook generation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Directly lower bounding the information capacity for channels with I.I.D.deletions and duplications
abstract
In this paper, we directly lower bound the information capacity for channels with independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) deletions and duplications. Our approach differs from previous work in that we focus on the information capacity using ideas from renewal theory, rather than focusing on the transmission capacity by analyzing the error probability of some randomly generated code using a combinatorial argument. Of course, the transmission and information capacities are equal, but our change of perspective allows for a much simpler analysis that gives more general theoretical results. We then apply these results to the binary deletion channel to improve existing lower bounds on its capacity.
Adam Kirsch, Eleni Drinea
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2009 Delay with network coding and feedback
abstract
We consider the problem of minimizing delay when broadcasting over erasure channels with feedback. A sender wishes to communicate the same set of mu messages to several receivers over separate erasure channels. The sender can broadcast a single message or a combination (encoding) of messages at each timestep. Receivers provide feedback as to whether the transmission was received. If at some time step a receiver cannot identify a new message, delay is incurred. Our notion of delay is motivated by real-time applications that request progressively refined input, such as the successive refinement of an image encoded using multiple description coding. Our setup is novel because it combines coding techniques with feedback information to the end of minimizing delay. It allows Theta(mu) benefits as compared to previous approaches for offline algorithms, while feedback allows online algorithms to achieve smaller delay than online algorithms without feedback. Our main complexity results are that the offline minimization problem is NP-hard when the sender only schedules single messages and that the general problem remains NP-hard even when coding is allowed. However we show that coding does offer delay and complexity gains over scheduling. We also discuss online heuristics and evaluate their performance through simulations.
Eleni Drinea, Christina Fragouli, Lorenzo Keller
ISIT1
2007 Directly Lower Bounding the Information Capacity for Channels with I.I.D. Deletions and Duplications
abstract
We directly lower bound the information capacity for channels with i.i.d. deletions and duplications. Our approach differs from previous work in that we focus on the information capacity using ideas from renewal theory, rather than focusing on the transmission capacity by analyzing the error probability of some randomly generated code using a combinatorial argument. Of course, the transmission and information capacities are equal, but our change of perspective allows for a much simpler analysis that gives more general theoretical results. We then apply these results to the binary deletion channel to improve existing lower bounds on its capacity.
Eleni Drinea, Adam Kirsch
ISIT1
2007 Improved Lower Bounds for the Capacity of i.i.d. Deletion and Duplication Channels
abstract
This paper considers the capacity of binary deletion channels, where bits are deleted independently with probability d. It improves significantly upon the best previous framework used to obtain provable lower bounds on this capacity by utilizing a stronger definition of a typical output from the channel. The new results give the best known provable bounds on the capacity for all values of d. Moreover, the techniques presented here extend to yield lower bounds for channels with certain types of random insertions, namely, duplications, or combinations of duplications and deletions. To demonstrate these techniques in this context, two binary channels are analyzed: a channel where each transmitted bit is copied with probability nu and a channel where each transmitted bit is copied a geometrically distributed number of times.
Eleni Drinea, Michael Mitzenmacher
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2006 On Lower Bounds for the Capacity of Deletion Channels
abstract
This correspondence considers binary deletion channels, where bits are deleted independently with probability d; it improves upon the framework used to analyze the capacity of binary deletion channels established by Diggavi and Grossglauser, improving on their lower bounds. Diggavi and Grossglauser considered codebooks with codewords generated by a first-order Markov chain. They only consider typical outputs, where an output is typical if an N bit input gives an N(1-d)(1-epsi) bit output. The improvements in this correspondence arise from two considerations. First, a stronger notion of a typical output from the channel is used, which yields better bounds even for the codebooks studied by Diggavi and Grossglauser. Second, codewords generated by more general processes than first-order Markov chains are considered
Eleni Drinea, Michael Mitzenmacher
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2006 A Simple Lower Bound for the Capacity of the Deletion Channel
abstract
We present a simple proof that the capacity of the binary independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) deletion channel, where each bit is deleted independently with probability d, is at least (1-d)/9, by developing a correspondence between the deletion channel and an insertion/deletion channel that we call a Poisson-repeat channel
Michael Mitzenmacher, Eleni Drinea
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2004 On lower bounds for the capacity of deletion channels
abstract
We consider binary deletion channels, where bits are deleted independently with probability d. We extend the framework used to analyze the capacity of binary deletion channels established by Diggavi and Grossglauser [2001], improving on their lower bounds. In Diggavi and Grossglauser, the codewords are generated by a first order Markov chain. Our improvements arise from two considerations. First, Diggavi and Grossglauser consider typical outputs, where an output is typical if an N bit input produces an output of at least N(1-d)(1-/spl epsi/) bits. We provide a stronger notion of a typical output that yields better bounds even for the cases studied in Diggavi and Grossglauser. Second, we consider codewords generated by more general processes than first order Markov chains.
Eleni Drinea, Michael Mitzenmacher
ISIT1
2002 Balls and bins models with feedback
Eleni Drinea, Alan M. Frieze, Michael Mitzenmacher
SODA1