Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Viviana Elizabet Quincoces
dblp:38/5898
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 56% Empirical software engineering · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Human capacities in the software process: empiric validation · ICSE 2002 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software process |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Human capacities in the software process: empiric validation · ICSE 2002 |
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Human capacities in the software process: empiric validation · ICSE 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical validation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Metrics of Credibility and Interaction Quality: Design and Evaluation
Nilda María Pérez Otero, Claudio Marcelo Pérez Ibarra, Sandra A. Méndez, Adelina García, María del Pilar Gálvez Díaz, Viviana Elizabet Quincoces, Héctor Pedro Liberatori, Beatriz Fiorito, Cecilia María Lasserre |
SEKE | 6 |
| 2002 | Human capacities in the software process: empiric validationabstractIn this paper an empiric validation of a Person to Role Allocation Process is presented. In this process the allocation of persons to fulfill roles is made according to the capacities that the persons possess and those required by the roles in the software process. A set of experiments are carried out dealing with the development of the Initiation, Planning and Estimation Process, Domain Study Process, Requirements Analysis Process and Design Process of eight projects. It was proved that the estimated time deviation, as well as the errors found in the technical reviews of requirements specification, were less when the persons fulfilling the roles of planning engineer, domain analyst, requirements specificator and designer were allocated, according to the proposed process, considering the set of critical human capacities. Silvia Teresita Acuña, Cecilia María Lasserre, Viviana Elizabet Quincoces |
ICSE | 3 |