Jan Witt

dblp:38/628 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 87% Compilers and program optimization · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
language design
0.011975
The COLUMBUS Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
structured programming
0.011975
The COLUMBUS Approach · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nassi-shneiderman charts · 0.0control primitives · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Practitioner and SoftClass: A comparative study of two software reuse research projects
Hafedh Mili, Roy Rada, Karl Strickland, Cornelia Boldyreff, Lene Olsen, Jan Witt, Jurgen Heger, Wolfgang Scherr, Peter F. Elzer
J. Syst. Softw.7
1975 The COLUMBUS Approach
abstract
This paper describes an interactive system-COLUMBUS-for the development of well-structured programs in assembly language, Cobol, and PL/I. One of the basic concepts employed is the use of Nassi/Shneiderman charts as the unique reference document. For specifying the control structures of a program, the programmer uses a set of control primitives which are common for all languages used. Data declarations and executable statements are taken from the individual language. This mixture is called the COLUMBUS source form. From this source form Nassi/Shneiderman diagrams and cross-reference matrices can be produced in a language-independent fashion; pure source for the individual languages is produced by a set of preprocessors in a language-dependent fashion. This paper illustrates the mechanisms involved by giving some small examples for the individual languages, and it also gives a brief history of the project and reports on quantitative and qualitative results obtained so far. The plans for future extensions are also explained.
Jan Witt
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1