Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Romar dela Cruz

dblp:38/8036 · also Romar B. dela Cruz · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-3563-2262ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 50% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
combinatorial design
0.512021
Majority Logic Decoding With Subspace Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.512021
Majority Logic Decoding With Subspace Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
majority-logic decoding
0.512021
Majority Logic Decoding With Subspace Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › combinatorial design
subspace designs
0.512021
Majority Logic Decoding With Subspace Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

combinatorial design theory · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Majority Logic Decoding With Subspace Designs
abstract
Rudolph (1967) introduced one-step majority logic decoding for linear codes derived from combinatorial designs. The decoder is easily realizable in hardware and requires that the dual code has to contain the blocks of so called geometric designs as codewords. Peterson and Weldon (1972) extended Rudolph's algorithm to a two-step majority logic decoder correcting the same number of errors as Reed's celebrated multi-step majority logic decoder. Here, we study the codes from subspace designs. It turns out that these codes have the same majority logic decoding capability as the codes from geometric designs, but their majority logic decoding complexity is sometimes drastically improved. For a known infinite series of subspace designs the reduction of complexity is exponential.
Romar dela Cruz, Alfred Wassermann
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2015 The minimum number of minimal codewords in an [n, k]-code and in graphic codes
Adel Alahmadi, Robert E. L. Aldred, Romar dela Cruz, Seongmin Ok, Patrick Solé, Carsten Thomassen
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2013 The maximum number of minimal codewords in long codes
Adel Alahmadi, Robert E. L. Aldred, Romar dela Cruz, Patrick Solé, Carsten Thomassen
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2010 An extension of Massey scheme for secret sharing
abstract
We consider an extension of Massey's construction of secret sharing schemes using linear codes. We describe the access structure of the scheme and show its connection to the dual code. We use the g-fold joint weight enumerator and invariant theory to study the access structure.
Romar dela Cruz, Annika Meyer, Patrick Solé
ITW1