Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Changjiu Jin

dblp:38/8165 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Graph data management · 96% Query processing and optimization · 4%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management › graph query
visual subgraph query formulation
0.322012
PRAGUE: Towards Blending Practical Visual Subgraph Query Formulation and Query Processing · ICDE 2012
GBLENDER: towards blending visual query formulation and query processing in graph databases · SIGMOD Conference 2010
Graph data management › graph pattern matching
subgraph matching
0.222011
GBLENDER: visual subgraph query formulation meets query processing · SIGMOD Conference 2011
GBLENDER: towards blending visual query formulation and query processing in graph databases · SIGMOD Conference 2010
Graph data management › graph query processing
subgraph query processing
0.112012
PRAGUE: Towards Blending Practical Visual Subgraph Query Formulation and Query Processing · ICDE 2012
Graph data management › graph similarity search
subgraph similarity search
0.112012
PRAGUE: Towards Blending Practical Visual Subgraph Query Formulation and Query Processing · ICDE 2012
User interface design and tools › search interface
visual query interface
0.012011
GBLENDER: visual subgraph query formulation meets query processing · SIGMOD Conference 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spindle-shaped graph · 0.4action-aware indexing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 PRAGUE: Towards Blending Practical Visual Subgraph Query Formulation and Query Processing
abstract
In a previous paper, we laid out the vision of a novel graph query processing paradigm where instead of processing a visual query graph after its construction, it interleaves visual query formulation and processing by exploiting the latency offered by the GUI to filter irrelevant matches and prefetch partial query results [8]. Our first attempt at implementing this vision, called GBLENDER [8], shows significant improvement in system response time (SRT) for sub graph containment queries. However, GBLENDER suffers from two key drawbacks, namely inability to handle visual sub graph similarity queries and inefficient support for visual query modification, limiting its usage in practical environment. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm called PRAGUE (Practical visu Al Graph QUery Blender), that addresses these limitations by exploiting a novel data structure called spindle-shaped graphs (SPIG). A SPIG succinctly records various information related to the set of super graphs of a newly added edge in the visual query fragment. Specifically, PRAGUE realizes a unified visual framework to support SPIG-based processing of modification-efficient sub graph containment and similarity queries. Extensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate effectiveness of PRAGUE.
Changjiu Jin, Sourav S. Bhowmick, Byron Choi, Shuigeng Zhou
ICDE1
2011 GBLENDER: visual subgraph query formulation meets query processing
abstract
Due to the complexity of graph query languages, the need for visual query interfaces that can reduce the burden of query formulation is fundamental to the spreading of graph data management tools to wider community. We present a novel HCI (human-computer interaction)-aware graph query processing paradigm, where instead of processing a query graph after its construction, it interleaves visual query construction and processing to improve system response time. We demonstrate a system called GBLENDER that exploits GUI latency to prune false results and prefetch candidate data graphs by employing a novel action-aware indexing scheme and a data structure called spindle-shaped graphs (SPIG). We demonstrate various innovative features of GBLENDER and its promising performance in evaluating subgraph containment and similarity queries.
Changjiu Jin, Sourav S. Bhowmick, Xiaokui Xiao, Byron Choi, Shuigeng Zhou
SIGMOD Conference1
2010 GBLENDER: towards blending visual query formulation and query processing in graph databases
abstract
Given a graph database D and a query graph g, an exact subgraph matching query asks for the set S of graphs in D that contain g as a subgraph. This type of queries find important applications in several domains such as bioinformatics and chemoinformatics, where users are generally not familiar with complex graph query languages. Consequently, user-friendly visual interfaces which support query graph construction can reduce the burden of data retrieval for these users. Existing techniques for subgraph matching queries built on top of such visual framework are designed to optimize the time required in retrieving the result set S from D, assuming that the whole query graph has been constructed. This leads to sub-optimal system response time as the query processing is initiated only after the user has finished drawing the query graph.
Changjiu Jin, Sourav S. Bhowmick, Xiaokui Xiao, James Cheng, Byron Choi
SIGMOD Conference1