Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiuna Tan
dblp:380/0012
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-1496-1304ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Vision and language · 62% Language models and text generation · 25% Image recognition and object detection · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025 V-Oracle: Making Progressive Reasoning in Deciphering Oracle Bones for You and Me · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Large Language Models towards Computer Science Mastery · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OCR-Critic: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models' Perception through Critical Feedback · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | V-Oracle: Making Progressive Reasoning in Deciphering Oracle Bones for You and Me · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › text recognition
optical character recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | OCR-Critic: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models' Perception through Critical Feedback · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | V-Oracle: Making Progressive Reasoning in Deciphering Oracle Bones for You and Me · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multilingual evaluation · 1.7benchmark construction · 1.7large multimodal model · 1.7visual instruction tuning · 0.9oracle alignment tuning · 0.9dynamic alignment strategy · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | V-Oracle: Making Progressive Reasoning in Deciphering Oracle Bones for You and MeabstractOracle Bone Script (OBS) is a vital treasure of human civilization, rich in insights from ancient societies. However, the evolution of written language over millennia complicates its decipherment. In this paper, we propose V-Oracle, an innovative framework that utilizes Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) for interpreting OBS. V-Oracle applies principles of pictographic character formation and frames the task as a visual question-answering (VQA) problem, establishing a multi-step reasoning chain. It proposes a multi-dimensional data augmentation for synthesizing high-quality OBS samples, and also implements a multi-phase oracle alignment tuning to improve LMMs’ visual reasoning capabilities. Moreover, to bridge the evaluation gap in the OBS field, we further introduce Oracle-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark that emphasizes process-oriented assessment and incorporates both standard and out-of-distribution setups for realistic evaluation. Extensive experimental results can demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in providing quantitative analyses and superior deciphering capability. Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong 0001, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Jiapeng Wang 0005, Zhuoma Gongque, Yadong Xue, Zhimin Bao, Lan Yang 0014, Chen Li 0031, Honggang Zhang 0002 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?abstractRunqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, YiFan Zhang, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Peiqing Yang, Zhimin Bao, Muxi Diao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong 0001, Minhui Wu, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang 0005, Zhuoma Gongque, Shanglin Lei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Xiao Zong, Peiqing Yang 0003, Zhimin Bao, Muxi Diao, Chen Li 0031, Honggang Zhang 0002 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | CS-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Large Language Models towards Computer Science MasteryabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in advancing various fields of research and society. However, the current community of LLMs overly focuses on benchmarks for analyzing specific foundational skills (e.g. mathematics and code generation), neglecting an all-round evaluation of the computer science field. To bridge this gap, we introduce CS-Bench, the first multilingual (English, Chinese, French, German) benchmark dedicated to evaluating the performance of LLMs in computer science. CS-Bench comprises approximately 10K meticulously curated test samples, covering 26 subfields across 4 key areas of computer science, encompassing various task forms and divisions of knowledge and reasoning. Utilizing CS-Bench, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of over 30 mainstream LLMs, revealing the relationship between CS performance and model scales. We also quantitatively analyze the reasons for failures in existing LLMs and highlight directions for improvements, including knowledge supplementation and CS-specific reasoning. Further cross-capability experiments show a high correlation between LLMs' capabilities in computer science and their abilities in mathematics and coding. Moreover, expert LLMs specialized in mathematics and coding also demonstrate strong performances in several CS subfields. Looking ahead, we envision CS-Bench serving as a cornerstone for LLM applications in the CS field and paving new avenues in assessing LLMs' diverse reasoning capabilities. Our project homepage is available at https://csbench.github.io/. Xiaoshuai Song, Muxi Diao, Guanting Dong 0001, Yujia Fu, Runqi Qiao, Zhexu Wang, Dayuan Fu, Huangxuan Wu, Weihao Zeng 0003, Yejie Wang, Zhuoma Gongque, Jianing Yu 0001, Qiuna Tan, Weiran Xu |
ICLR | 15 |
| 2025 | OCR-Critic: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models' Perception through Critical FeedbackabstractRecent advancements in Large Multimodal Models have demonstrated impressive performance in various tasks. However, their capabilities in error detection and resolution for Optical Character Recognition (OCR) remain underexplored. To address this gap, we construct the first visual instruction tuning dataset specifically for detailed OCR error analysis. Building on this foundation, we develop a universal, plug-and-play OCR-Critic model that incorporates three novel dynamic alignment strategies. These strategies systematically mitigate LMMs' weaknesses in OCR tasks by providing coarse-to-fine error feedback. To comprehensively evaluate these capabilities, we introduce OCR-ERROR, a benchmark designed to assess LMMs' ability to detect and categorize OCR errors, covering two task types, diverse error categories, and 2,400 rigorously validated samples. Experimental results show that OCR-Critic effectively identifies fine-grained OCR errors across multiple domains. With the integration of our dynamic alignment strategies, the LMM further achieves substantial performance gains on four prominent benchmarks, demonstrating both versatility and effectiveness. Qiuna Tan, Runqi Qiao, Guanting Dong 0001, Minhui Wu, Jiapeng Wang 0005, Miaoxuan Zhang, Chen Li 0031, Honggang Zhang 0002 |
ACM Multimedia | 1 |