Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chenglin Tian
dblp:380/0273
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-4343-2586ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data models and query languages · 77% Database system architecture and tuning · 23% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data models and query languages › SQL
SQL semantics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Semantic Conformance Testing of Relational DBMS · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Software testing › specification-based testing
conformance testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Semantic Conformance Testing of Relational DBMS · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Database system architecture and tuning
relational database system |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Semantic Conformance Testing of Relational DBMS · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prolog · 1.5differential testing · 1.5coverage-guided query generation · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DBRooter: An Efficient Causal Root Cause Analysis Framework for Distributed Databases
Qingfeng Xiang, Yingxia Shao, Chenglin Tian, Quanqing Xu, Qiyao Luo |
DASFAA (2) | 3 |
| 2026 | LLMSQLMUTATOR: LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for Database Using Bug Reports
Chenglin Tian, Yingxia Shao |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2024 | Semantic Conformance Testing of Relational DBMSabstractRelational DBMS implementations are expected to adhere to SQL standards. However, there are currently no tools available that can automatically verify this conformance. The main reasons are twofold. First, the SQL standard specification, documented in natural language, tends to be ambiguous and is not directly executable. Second, it is difficult to generate test queries that thoroughly cover all aspects, e.g., keywords and parameters, defined in the SQL specification. In this work, we introduce the first method for semantic conformance testing of RDBMSs. Our contributions are threefold. Firstly, we formally define the denotational semantics of SQL and implement them in Prolog, creating an executable reference RDBMS for differential testing against existing RDBMSs. Secondly, we propose three coverage criteria based on these formal semantics, along with a coverage-guided query generation algorithm that effectively generates queries achieving high semantic coverage. Lastly, we apply our approach to six widely-used and thoroughly tested RDBMSs, e.g., MySQL, PostgreSQL and OceanBase, uncovering 19 bugs and 13 inconsistencies, all of which are confirmed by RDBMS developers. Shuang Liu 0007, Chenglin Tian, Jun Sun 0001, Wei Lu 0015, Yinxing Xue, Junjie Wang 0007, Xiaoyong Du 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |