Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingyu Zheng
dblp:380/1246
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 56% Cloud and datacenter computing · 44% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic commitments
polynomial commitment |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MPA: Lightweight and Updatable Integrity Auditing for Decentralized Storage Using Merkle Trees and Polynomial Commitments · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud storage
data integrity auditing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MPA: Lightweight and Updatable Integrity Auditing for Decentralized Storage Using Merkle Trees and Polynomial Commitments · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MPA: Lightweight and Updatable Integrity Auditing for Decentralized Storage Using Merkle Trees and Polynomial Commitments · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Storage systems › distributed storage
decentralized storage |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | MPA: Lightweight and Updatable Integrity Auditing for Decentralized Storage Using Merkle Trees and Polynomial Commitments · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial commitment · 2.0merkle tree · 2.0blockchain · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MPA: Lightweight and Updatable Integrity Auditing for Decentralized Storage Using Merkle Trees and Polynomial CommitmentsabstractWith the growing demand for outsourcing data to decentralized storage systems, ensuring the integrity of out-sourced data becomes a critical challenge. Existing auditing schemes, however, often assume single-copy or centralized models, and suffer from inefficiency, lack of public verifiability, or poor scalability in multi-replica settings. To address these limitations, we propose MPA, a lightweight and publicly verifiable auditing scheme tailored for multi-copy cloud storage. By integrating polynomial commitment schemes with Merkle trees, our design achieves efficient block-level integrity verification while enabling dynamic updates. To mitigate collusion between cloud service providers, each data copy is uniquely encrypted, and the audit process supports simultaneous verification across multiple providers. Furthermore, we introduce an optimized batch auditing mechanism that allows the verifier to aggregate proofs across different files and providers, reducing both computation and communication overhead. To enhance audit transparency and unpredictability, we adopt a blockchain-assisted challenge generation protocol based on commit-and-reveal randomness. Theoretical analysis and performance evaluation demonstrate that MPA achieves strong security guarantees under standard assumptions, while significantly outperforming existing solutions in terms of efficiency and scalability. Yongliang Xu, Hang Cheng, Jingyu Zheng, Xinpeng Zhang 0001, Huaxiong Wang |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 3 |
| 2024 | Inter-structure and intra-semantics graph contrastive learning for disease prediction
Yan Kang 0003, Jingyu Zheng, Mingjian Yang |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |