Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haoyuan Chai
dblp:380/2334
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 77% Question answering and dialogue systems · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ClinicalLab: Aligning Agents for Multi-Departmental Clinical Diagnostics in the Real World · NeurIPS 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical diagnosis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ClinicalLab: Aligning Agents for Multi-Departmental Clinical Diagnostics in the Real World · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
clinical dialogue |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ClinicalLab: Aligning Agents for Multi-Departmental Clinical Diagnostics in the Real World · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clinical metrics · 1.7clinical agent alignment · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ClinicalLab: Aligning Agents for Multi-Departmental Clinical Diagnostics in the Real WorldabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have achieved significant performance progress in various natural language processing applications. However, LLMs still struggle to meet the strict requirements for accuracy and reliability in the medical field and face many challenges in clinical applications. Existing clinical diagnostic evaluation benchmarks for evaluating medical agents powered by LLMs have severe limitations. To address these limitations, we introduce ClinicalLab, a comprehensive clinical diagnosis agent alignment suite. ClinicalLab includes ClinicalBench, an end-to-end multi-departmental clinical diagnostic evaluation benchmark for evaluating medical agents and LLMs. ClinicalBench is based on real cases that cover 24 departments and 150 diseases. We ensure that ClinicalBench does not have data leakage. ClinicalLab also includes four novel metrics (ClinicalMetrics) for evaluating the effectiveness of LLMs in clinical diagnostic tasks. We evaluate 17 general and medical-domain LLMs and find that their performance varies significantly across different departments. Based on these findings, in ClinicalLab, we propose ClinicalAgent, an end-to-end clinical agent that aligns with real-world clinical diagnostic practices. We systematically investigate the performance and applicable scenarios of variants of ClinicalAgent on ClinicalBench. Our findings demonstrate the importance of aligning with modern medical practices in designing medical agents. Weixiang Yan, Tengxiao Wu, Qian Chen 0003, Wen Wang 0001, Haoyuan Chai |
NeurIPS | 6 |