EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nachiket Kotalwar
dblp:380/3774
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 59% Reinforcement learning · 41% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
best arm identification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Inference-Time Personalized Alignment with a Few User Preference Queries · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment › pluralistic alignment
personalized alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Inference-Time Personalized Alignment with a Few User Preference Queries · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computing education › programming education
automated feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hints-In-Browser: Benchmarking Language Models for Programming Feedback Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computing education
programming education |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hints-In-Browser: Benchmarking Language Models for Programming Feedback Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › parametric bandits
logistic bandit |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Inference-Time Personalized Alignment with a Few User Preference Queries · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 2.3quantization · 2.3fine-tuning · 2.3preference elicitation · 0.9pairwise comparison · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Humanizing Automated Programming Feedback: Fine-Tuning Generative Models with Student-Written Feedback
Victor-Alexandru Padurean, Tung Phung, Nachiket Kotalwar, Michael Liut, Juho Leinonen 0001, Paul Denny 0001, Adish Singla |
EDM | 3 |
| 2025 | Inference-Time Personalized Alignment with a Few User Preference QueriesabstractWe study the problem of aligning a generative model's response with a user's preferences. Recent works have proposed several different formulations for personalized alignment; however, they either require a large amount of user preference queries or require that the preference be explicitly specified as a text input. In this paper, we propose a novel inference-time personalized alignment method, UserAlign, that elicits the user's preferences with a few queries as pairwise response comparisons. In particular, UserAlign builds on the theoretical framework of best-arm identification in logistic bandits and selects a personalized response from a fixed pool of the model's generated responses. The key idea is to consider the user's feedback consistent and noise-free, and incorporate it into the theoretical framework to identify the best response quickly. Experimental results across several tasks, involving personalized text and image generation, showcase the effectiveness of UserAlign in achieving personalized alignment. Victor-Alexandru Padurean, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Nachiket Kotalwar, Alkis Gotovos, Adish Singla |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Hints-In-Browser: Benchmarking Language Models for Programming Feedback GenerationabstractGenerative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by generating individualized feedback and hints for learners. Recent works have primarily focused on improving the quality of generated feedback to achieve human tutors' quality. While quality is an important performance criterion, it is not the only criterion to optimize for real-world educational deployments. In this paper, we benchmark language models for programming feedback generation across several performance criteria, including quality, cost, time, and data privacy. The key idea is to leverage recent advances in the new paradigm of in-browser inference that allow running these models directly in the browser, thereby providing direct benefits across cost and data privacy. To boost the feedback quality of small models compatible with in-browser inference engines, we develop a fine-tuning pipeline based on GPT-4 generated synthetic data. We showcase the efficacy of fine-tuned Llama3-8B and Phi3-3.8B 4-bit quantized models using WebLLM's in-browser inference engine on three different Python programming datasets. We will release the full implementation along with a web app and datasets to facilitate further research on in-browser language models. Nachiket Kotalwar, Alkis Gotovos, Adish Singla |
NeurIPS | 1 |