Victor Tobiasson

dblp:380/5004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8920-017XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
biomedical visualization
0.812024
A Visual Environment for Data Driven Protein Modeling and Validation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024
Visualization and visual analytics › information visualization › statistical graphics
heat map visualization
0.812024
A Visual Environment for Data Driven Protein Modeling and Validation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural biology
0.212024
A Visual Environment for Data Driven Protein Modeling and Validation · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

participatory design · 1.53d molecular visualization · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Visual Environment for Data Driven Protein Modeling and Validation
abstract
In structural biology, validation and verification of new atomic models are crucial and necessary steps which limit the production of reliable molecular models for publications and databases. An atomic model is the result of meticulous modeling and matching and is evaluated using a variety of metrics that provide clues to improve and refine the model so it fits our understanding of molecules and physical constraints. In cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM) the validation is also part of an iterative modeling process in which there is a need to judge the quality of the model during the creation phase. A shortcoming is that the process and results of the validation are rarely communicated using visual metaphors. This work presents a visual framework for molecular validation. The framework was developed in close collaboration with domain experts in a participatory design process. Its core is a novel visual representation based on 2D heatmaps that shows all available validation metrics in a linear fashion, presenting a global overview of the atomic model and provide domain experts with interactive analysis tools. Additional information stemming from the underlying data, such as a variety of local quality measures, is used to guide the user's attention toward regions of higher relevance. Linked with the heatmap is a three-dimensional molecular visualization providing the spatial context of the structures and chosen metrics. Additional views of statistical properties of the structure are included in the visual framework. We demonstrate the utility of the framework and its visual guidance with examples from cryo-EM.
Martin Falk, Victor Tobiasson, Alexander Bock 0002, Charles D. Hansen, Anders Ynnerman
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2