Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naresh Shanbhag
dblp:380/5748
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 61% Memory systems · 30% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › architectural simulation
full-system simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Full-system, Programmable, and Extensible In-Memory Computing Simulation Framework for Deep Learning · DAC 2025 |
Memory systems
processing-in-memory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Full-system, Programmable, and Extensible In-Memory Computing Simulation Framework for Deep Learning · DAC 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › simulation software
simulation framework |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Full-system, Programmable, and Extensible In-Memory Computing Simulation Framework for Deep Learning · DAC 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Full-system, Programmable, and Extensible In-Memory Computing Simulation Framework for Deep Learning · DAC 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tensor operator mapping · 0.9device-circuit modeling · 0.9ISA extension · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Detector-in-Memory for Massive MIMO Detection
Ryan Yuyang Fu, Mihir Kavishwar, Naresh Shanbhag |
ISCAS | 3 |
| 2025 | A Full-system, Programmable, and Extensible In-Memory Computing Simulation Framework for Deep LearningabstractIn-memory computing (IMC) has established itself as an attractive alternative to hardware accelerators in addressing the memory wall problem for artificial intelligence (AI) workloads. However, designing programmable IMC-based computing platforms for today’s large generative AI models, such as large language models (LLMs) and diffusion transformers (DiTs), is hindered by the absence of a simulator that is able to address the associated scalability challenges while simultaneously incorporating device and circuit-level behaviors intrinsic to IMCs. To address this challenge, we present IMCsim, a versatile fullsystem IMC simulation framework. IMCsim integrates software runtime libraries for AI models, introduces a new set of ISA extensions to express common tensor operators, and provides flexibility in mapping these operators to various IMC architectures. As such, IMCsim enables designers to explore trade-offs between performance, energy, area, and computational accuracy for various IMC design choices. To demonstrate the functionality, efficiency, and versatility of IMCsim, we model three types of IMCs: (1) embedded non-volatile memory (eNVM)-based, (2) SRAM-based, and (3) digital IMCs. We validate IMCsim using measured data from two laboratory-tested IMC prototype ICs—a 22 nm MRAM-based IMC and a 28 nm SRAM-based IMC—and a digital IMC design in 28 nm. Next, we demonstrate the utility of IMCsim by exploring the architectural design space to obtain insights for maximizing utilization of IMC-based processors for diverse workloads—ResNet-18, Llama, and a DiT—using the three IMC types. Finally, we employ IMCsim as a design tool to obtain an efficient chip architecture and layout in 28 nm for a lightweight DiT. Kaining Zhou, Jian Huang 0006, Nam Sung Kim, Naresh Shanbhag |
DAC | 4 |
| 2024 | Massive MIMO Signal Detection using SRAM-based In-Memory ComputingabstractThis paper explores the use of static random access memory (SRAM)-based in-memory computing (IMC) architectures as signal detectors in massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) wireless receivers. SRAM-based IMCs have demonstrated significant benefits in terms of energy efficiency and compute density over digital accelerators for deep learning workloads. However, their limited compute accuracy has hindered their application in other domains. Employing system-level models of the wireless channel and behavioral models of an SRAM-based IMC in 28nm CMOS process, we show that a symbol error rate (SER)−4can be achieved for SNR ≥ 19dB when implementing zero forcing (ZF) or linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) detectors on a SRAM-based IMC for a 128×16 MIMO uplink. Mihir Kavishwar, Naresh Shanbhag |
ISCAS | 2 |