Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linxi Liang
dblp:380/7776
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-0362-2315ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 77% Program synthesis and code generation · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
code search |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › code search
semantic code search |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Software testing › test infrastructure
benchmark construction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-driven agent annotation · 2.0large language model · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven AgentsabstractSemantic code search, retrieving code that matches a given natural language query, is an important task to improve productivity in software engineering. Existing code search datasets face limitations: they rely on human annotators who assess code primarily through semantic understanding rather than functional verification, leading to potential inaccuracies and scalability issues. Additionally, current evaluation metrics often overlook the multichoice nature of code search. This paper introduces CoSQA+, pairing high-quality queries from CoSQA with multiple suitable codes. We develop an automated pipeline featuring multiple model-based candidate selections and the novel test-driven agent annotation system. Among a single Large Language Model (LLM) annotator and Python expert annotators (without test-based verification), agents leverage test-based verification and achieve the highest accuracy of 93.9%. Through extensive experiments, CoSQA+ has demonstrated superior quality over CoSQA. Models trained on CoSQA+ exhibit improved performance. We publicly release both CoSQA+-all, which contains 412,080 agent-annotated pairs, and CoSQA+-verified, which contains 1,000 human-verified pairs. Yanghui Wu, Linxi Liang, Yanlin Wang 0001, Jiachi Chen, Mingwei Liu 0002, Zibin Zheng |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |