Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linxi Liang

dblp:380/7776 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-0362-2315ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 77% Program synthesis and code generation · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
code search
1.012026
CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › code search
semantic code search
1.012026
CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026
Software testing › test infrastructure
benchmark construction
1.012026
CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.312026
CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-driven agent annotation · 2.0large language model · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CoSQA+: Enhancing Code Search Evaluation With a Multi-Choice Benchmark and Test-Driven Agents
abstract
Semantic code search, retrieving code that matches a given natural language query, is an important task to improve productivity in software engineering. Existing code search datasets face limitations: they rely on human annotators who assess code primarily through semantic understanding rather than functional verification, leading to potential inaccuracies and scalability issues. Additionally, current evaluation metrics often overlook the multichoice nature of code search. This paper introduces CoSQA+, pairing high-quality queries from CoSQA with multiple suitable codes. We develop an automated pipeline featuring multiple model-based candidate selections and the novel test-driven agent annotation system. Among a single Large Language Model (LLM) annotator and Python expert annotators (without test-based verification), agents leverage test-based verification and achieve the highest accuracy of 93.9%. Through extensive experiments, CoSQA+ has demonstrated superior quality over CoSQA. Models trained on CoSQA+ exhibit improved performance. We publicly release both CoSQA+-all, which contains 412,080 agent-annotated pairs, and CoSQA+-verified, which contains 1,000 human-verified pairs.
Yanghui Wu, Linxi Liang, Yanlin Wang 0001, Jiachi Chen, Mingwei Liu 0002, Zibin Zheng
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3