Abstract Program synthesis is the task of automatically deriving a program that has been specified by a user in advance. Combining automated theorem proving with program synthesis enables the automated construction of proven-to-be-correct programs, thereby ensuring software reliability. In this paper, we consider the superposition-based calculus extended to support synthesis of recursion-free programs allowing reasoning with uncomputable symbols. We present cases where the calculus fails and refine it to solve them. We prove that the refined calculus is sound. Finally, we also prove completeness in the following sense: if at least one computable program satisfying the given specification exists, we show that the modified calculus finds one.

Abstract Program synthesis is the task of constructing a program conforming to a given specification. We focus on deductive synthesis, and in particular on synthesis problems with specifications given as $$\forall \exists $$ ∀ ∃ -formulas, expressing the existence of an output corresponding to any input. So far there has been no canonical benchmark set for deductive synthesis using the $$\forall \exists $$ ∀ ∃ -format and supporting the so-called uncomputable symbol restriction. This work presents such a data set, composed by complementing existing benchmarks by new ones. Our data set is dynamically growing and should motivate future developments in the theory and practice of automating synthesis.

Abstract We turn saturation-based theorem proving into an automated framework for recursive program synthesis. We introduce magic axioms as valid induction axioms and use them together with answer literals in saturation. We introduce new inference rules for induction in saturation and use answer literals to synthesize recursive functions from these proof steps. Our proof-of-concept implementation in the Vampire theorem prover constructs recursive functions over algebraic data types, while proving inductive properties over these types.