Modular chiplet design enables independent chiplet development, but introduces integration deadlocks when assembling deadlock-free chiplets into 2.5D multi-chiplet module (MCM) systems. Existing solutions exhibit limitations: (1) turn-restriction approaches treat all potential deadlock cycles uniformly without distinguishing different deadlock structures; (2) virtual network schemes simply duplicate channel buffers on all routers, resulting in substantial redundancy. These solutions overlook the structural differences among deadlock types, leading to unnecessary routing constraints and redundant hardware.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) increasingly excel at perception,understanding, and reasoning. However, current benchmarks inadequately evaluate their ability to perform these tasks continuously in dynamic, real-world environments. To bridge this gap, we introduce RT V-Bench, a fine-grained benchmark for MLLM real-time video analysis. RTV-Bench includes three key principles: (1) Multi-Timestamp Question Answering (MTQA), where answers evolve with scene changes; (2) Hierarchical Question Structure, combining basic and advanced queries; and (3) Multi-dimensional Evaluation, assessing the ability of continuous perception, understanding, and reasoning. RTV-Bench contains 552 diverse videos (167.2 hours) and 4,631 high-quality QA pairs. We evaluated leading MLLMs, including proprietary (GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0), open-source offline (Qwen2.5-VL, VideoLLaMA3), and open-source real-time (VITA-1.5, InternLM-XComposer2.5-OmniLive) models. Experiment results show open-source real-time models largely outperform offline ones but still trail top proprietary models. Our analysis also reveals that larger model size or higher frame sampling rates do not significantly boost RTV-Bench performance, sometimes causing slight decreases.This underscores the need for better model architectures optimized for video stream processing and long sequences to advance real-time video analysis with MLLMs.

Dynamic binary translators (DBTs) are widely used to migrate applications between different instruction set architectures (ISAs). Despite extensive research to improve DBT performance, noticeable overhead remains, preventing near-native performance, especially when translating from complex instruction set computer (CISC) to reduced instruction set computer (RISC). For computational workloads, the main overhead stems from translated code quality. Experimental data show that state-of-the-art DBT products have dynamic code inflation of at least 1.46. This indicates that on average, more than 1.46 host instructions are needed to emulate one guest instruction. Worse, inflation closely correlates with translated code quality. However, the detailed sources of instruction inflation remain unclear. To understand the sources of inflation, we present Deflater , an instruction inflation analysis framework comprising a mathematical model, a collection of black-box unit tests called BenchMIAOes , and a trace-based simulator called InflatSim . The mathematical model calculates overall inflation based on the inflation of individual instructions and translation block optimizations. BenchMIAOes extract model parameters from DBTs without accessing DBT source code. InflatSim implements the model and uses the extracted parameters from BenchMIAOes to simulate a given DBT’s behavior. Deflater is a valuable tool to guide DBT analysis and improvement. Using Deflater, we simulated inflation for three state-of-the-art CISC-to-RISC DBTs: ExaGear, Rosetta2, and LATX, with inflation errors of 5.63%, 5.15%, and 3.44%, respectively for SPEC CPU 2017, gaining insights into these commercial DBTs. Deflater also efficiently models inflation for the open source DBT QEMU and suggests optimizations that can substantially reduce inflation. Implementing the suggested optimizations confirms Deflater’s effective guidance, with 4.65% inflation error, and gains 5.47x performance improvement.