Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Overman

dblp:381/1158 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 51% Language models and text generation · 26% Graph learning · 16%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.622025
Conformal Arbitrage: Risk-Controlled Balancing of Competing Objectives in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Aligning Model Properties via Conformal Risk Control · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › risk control
conformal risk control
1.622025
Conformal Arbitrage: Risk-Controlled Balancing of Competing Objectives in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Aligning Model Properties via Conformal Risk Control · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
risk control
1.622025
Conformal Arbitrage: Risk-Controlled Balancing of Competing Objectives in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Aligning Model Properties via Conformal Risk Control · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.812024
Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference · NeurIPS 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference
0.812024
Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference · NeurIPS 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
interference
0.812024
Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference · NeurIPS 2024
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
treatment effect estimation
0.812024
Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model deployment
0.312025
Conformal Arbitrage: Risk-Controlled Balancing of Competing Objectives in Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
network analysis
0.212024
Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
property testing
0.212024
Aligning Model Properties via Conformal Risk Control · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

conformal risk control · 1.6moment-based feature construction · 1.5function learning · 1.5threshold calibration · 0.9property testing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Conformal Arbitrage: Risk-Controlled Balancing of Competing Objectives in Language Models
abstract
Modern language‑model deployments must often balance competing objectives—for example, helpfulness versus harmlessness, cost versus accuracy, and reward versus safety. We introduce Conformal Arbitrage, a post‑hoc framework that learns a data‑driven threshold to mediate between a Primary model optimized for a primary objective and a more conservative Guardian—which could be another model or a human domain expert—aligned with a guardrail objective. The threshold is calibrated with conformal risk control, yielding finite‑sample, distribution‑free guarantees that the long‑run frequency of undesirable events (such as factual errors or safety violations) does not exceed a user‑specified quota. Because Conformal Arbitrage operates wholly at the API level—without requiring access to model logits or updating model weights—it complements weight‑based alignment techniques and integrates seamlessly with existing cost‑aware cascades. Empirically, Conformal Arbitrage traces an efficient frontier, allowing users to define an acceptable performance level for one objective while maximizing utility in another. We observe that our method outperforms (in terms of accuracy) cost-matched random routing between models. These properties make Conformal Arbitrage a practical, theoretically grounded tool for trustworthy and economical deployment of large language models across a broad range of potentially competing objectives.
William Overman, Mohsen Bayati
NeurIPS1
2024 Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference
abstract
Accurate estimation of treatment effects is essential for decision-making across various scientific fields. This task, however, becomes challenging in areas like social sciences and online marketplaces, where treating one experimental unit can influence outcomes for others through direct or indirect interactions. Such interference can lead to biased treatment effect estimates, particularly when the structure of these interactions is unknown. We address this challenge by introducing a new class of estimators based on causal message-passing, specifically designed for settings with pervasive, unknown interference. Our estimator draws on information from the sample mean and variance of unit outcomes and treatments over time, enabling efficient use of observed data to estimate the evolution of the system state. Concretely, we construct non-linear features from the moments of unit outcomes and treatments and then learn a function that maps these features to future mean and variance of unit outcomes. This allows for the estimation of the treatment effect over time. Extensive simulations across multiple domains, using synthetic and real network data, demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in estimating total treatment effect dynamics, even in cases where interference exhibits non-monotonic behavior in the probability of treatment.
Mohsen Bayati, Yuwei Luo, William Overman, Mohamad Sadegh Shirani Faradonbeh, Ruoxuan Xiong
NeurIPS3
2024 Aligning Model Properties via Conformal Risk Control
abstract
AI model alignment is crucial due to inadvertent biases in training data and the underspecified machine learning pipeline, where models with excellent test metrics may not meet end-user requirements. While post-training alignment via human feedback shows promise, these methods are often limited to generative AI settings where humans can interpret and provide feedback on model outputs. In traditional non-generative settings with numerical or categorical outputs, detecting misalignment through single-sample outputs remains challenging, and enforcing alignment during training requires repeating costly training processes. In this paper we consider an alternative strategy. We propose interpreting model alignment through property testing, defining an aligned model $f$ as one belonging to a subset $\mathcal{P}$ of functions that exhibit specific desired behaviors. We focus on post-processing a pre-trained model $f$ to better align with $\mathcal{P}$ using conformal risk control. Specifically, we develop a general procedure for converting queries for testing a given property $\mathcal{P}$ to a collection of loss functions suitable for use in a conformal risk control algorithm. We prove a probabilistic guarantee that the resulting conformal interval around $f$ contains a function approximately satisfying $\mathcal{P}$. We exhibit applications of our methodology on a collection of supervised learning datasets for (shape-constrained) properties such as monotonicity and concavity. The general procedure is flexible and can be applied to a wide range of desired properties. Finally, we prove that pre-trained models will always require alignment techniques even as model sizes or training data increase, as long as the training data contains even small biases.
William Overman, Jacqueline Jil Vallon, Mohsen Bayati
NeurIPS1