Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuanhe Zhang
dblp:381/4050
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › audio-language model
large audio language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hidden in the Noise: Unveiling Backdoors in Audio LLMs Alignment Through Latent Acoustic Pattern Triggers · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SEE: Signal Embedding Energy for Quantifying Noise Interference in Large Audio Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
audio backdoor attack |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hidden in the Noise: Unveiling Backdoors in Audio LLMs Alignment Through Latent Acoustic Pattern Triggers · AAAI 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Hidden in the Noise: Unveiling Backdoors in Audio LLMs Alignment Through Latent Acoustic Pattern Triggers · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRA-One: One-Step Full Gradient Could Suffice for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models, Provably and Efficiently · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LoRA-One: One-Step Full Gradient Could Suffice for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models, Provably and Efficiently · ICML 2025 |
Software testing › test input generation
test data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unit Test Update through LLM-Driven Context Collection and Error-Type-Aware Refinement · ASE 2025 |
Software testing
test maintenance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unit Test Update through LLM-Driven Context Collection and Error-Type-Aware Refinement · ASE 2025 |
Software testing
test repair |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unit Test Update through LLM-Driven Context Collection and Error-Type-Aware Refinement · ASE 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quasi-Bayes meets Vines · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quasi-Bayes meets Vines · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectrally tailored noise · 2.0acoustic trigger injection · 2.0signal embedding energy · 1.0preconditioning · 0.9large language model · 0.9iterative refinement · 0.9gradient descent analysis · 0.9error-type-aware refinement · 0.9vine copula · 0.8robust divergence · 0.8energy score · 0.8copula · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Hidden in the Noise: Unveiling Backdoors in Audio LLMs Alignment Through Latent Acoustic Pattern TriggersabstractAs Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) emerge as powerful tools for speech processing, their safety implications demand urgent attention. While considerable research has explored textual and vision safety, audio’s distinct characteristics present significant challenges. This paper first investigates: Is ALLM vulnerable to backdoor attacks exploiting acoustic triggers? In response to this issue, we introduce Hidden in the Noise (HIN), a novel backdoor attack framework designed to exploit subtle, audio-specific features. HIN applies acoustic modifications to raw audio waveforms, such as alterations to temporal dynamics and strategic injection of spectrally tailored noise. These changes introduce consistent patterns that an ALLM’s acoustic feature encoder captures, embedding robust triggers within the audio stream. To evaluate ALLM robustness against audio-feature-based triggers, we develop the AudioSafe benchmark, assessing nine distinct risk types. Extensive experiments on AudioSafe and three established safety datasets reveal critical vulnerabilities in existing ALLMs: (I) audio features like environment noise and speech rate variations achieve over 90% average attack success rate, (II) ALLMs exhibit significant sensitivity differences across acoustic features, particularly showing minimal response to volume as a trigger, and (III) poisoned sample inclusion causes only marginal loss curve fluctuations, highlighting the attack’s stealth. Liang Lin 0004, Kaiwen Luo, Lilan Peng, Dexian Wang 0001, Xuehai Tang, Yuanhe Zhang, Xikang Yang, Zhenhong Zhou, Kun Wang 0056, Yang Liu 0003 |
AAAI | 8 |
| 2026 | SEE: Signal Embedding Energy for Quantifying Noise Interference in Large Audio Language ModelsabstractYuanhe Zhang, Jiayu Tian, Yibo Zhang, Shilinlu Yan, Liang Lin, Zhenhong Zhou, Li Sun, Sen Su. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Yuanhe Zhang, Jiayu Tian, Shilinlu Yan, Liang Lin 0004, Zhenhong Zhou, Li Sun 0008, Sen Su |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | LoRA-One: One-Step Full Gradient Could Suffice for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models, Provably and EfficientlyabstractThis paper explores how theory can guide and enhance practical algorithms, using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) (Hu et al., 2022) in large language models as a case study. We rigorously prove that, under gradient descent, LoRA adapters align with specific singular subspaces of the one-step full fine-tuning gradient. This result suggests that, by properly initializing the adapters using the one-step full gradient, subspace alignment can be achieved immediately—applicable to both linear and nonlinear models. Building on our theory, we propose a theory-driven algorithm, LoRA-One, where the linear convergence (as well as generalization) is built and incorporating preconditioners theoretically helps mitigate the effects of ill-conditioning. Besides, our theory reveals connections between LoRA-One and other gradient-alignment-based methods, helping to clarify misconceptions in the design of such algorithms. LoRA-One achieves significant empirical improvements over LoRA and its variants across benchmarks in natural language understanding, mathematical reasoning, and code generation. Code is available at: https://github.com/YuanheZ/LoRA-One. Yuanhe Zhang, Fanghui Liu 0001, Yudong Chen 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Unit Test Update through LLM-Driven Context Collection and Error-Type-Aware RefinementabstractUnit testing is critical for ensuring software quality and software system stability. The current practice of manually maintaining unit tests suffers from low efficiency and the risk of delayed or overlooked fixes. Therefore, an automated approach is required to instantly update unit tests, with the capability to both repair and enhance unit tests. However, existing automated test maintenance methods primarily focus on repairing broken tests, neglecting the scenario of enhancing existing tests to verify new functionality. Meanwhile, due to their reliance on rule-based context collection and the lack of verification mechanisms, existing approaches struggle to handle complex code changes and often produce test cases with low correctness.To address these challenges, we propose TestUpdater, a novel Large Language Model (LLM) based approach that enables automated just-in-time test updates in response to production code changes. By emulating the reasoning process of developers, TestUpdater first leverages the LLM to analyze code changes and identify relevant context, which it then extracts and filters. This LLM-driven context collector can flexibly gather accurate and sufficient context, enabling better handling of complex code changes. Then, through carefully designed prompts, TestUpdater guides the LLM step by step to handle various types of code changes and introduce new dependencies, enabling both the repair of broken tests and the enhancement of tests. Finally, emulating the debugging process, we introduce an error-type-aware iterative refinement mechanism that executes the LLM-updated tests and repairs failures, which significantly improves the overall correctness of test updates.Since existing test repair datasets lack scenarios of test enhancement, we further construct a new benchmark, Updates4J, with 195 real-world samples from 7 projects, enabling execution-based evaluation of test updates. Experimental results show that TestUpdater achieves a compilation pass rate of 94.4% and a test pass rate of 86.7%, outperforming the state-of-the-art method Synter by 15.9% and 20.0%, respectively. Furthermore, TestUpdater exhibits 12.9% higher branch coverage and 15.2% greater line coverage than Synter. Yuanhe Zhang, Zhiquan Yang, Shengyi Pan, Zhongxin Liu 0002 |
ASE | 1 |
| 2025 | LIFEBENCH: Evaluating Length Instruction Following in Large Language ModelsabstractWhile large language models (LLMs) can solve PhD-level reasoning problems over long context inputs, they still struggle with a seemingly simpler task: following explicit length instructions—e.g., write a 10,000-word novel. Additionally, models often generate far too short outputs, terminate prematurely, or even refuse the request. Existing benchmarks focus primarily on evaluating generations quality, but often overlook whether the generations meet length constraints. To this end, we introduce Length Instruction Following Evaluation Benchmark (LIFEBench) to comprehensively evaluate LLMs' ability to follow length instructions across diverse tasks and a wide range of specified lengths. LIFEBench consists of 10,800 instances across 4 task categories in both English and Chinese, covering length constraints ranging from 16 to 8192 words. We evaluate 26 widely-used LLMs and find that most models reasonably follow short-length instructions but deteriorate sharply beyond a certain threshold. Surprisingly, almost all models fail to reach the vendor-claimed maximum output lengths in practice, as further confirmed by our evaluations extending up to 32K words. Even long-context LLMs, despite their extended input-output windows, counterintuitively fail to improve length-instructions following. Notably, Reasoning LLMs outperform even specialized long-text generation models, achieving state-of-the-art length following. Overall, LIFEBench uncovers fundamental limitations in current LLMs' length instructions following ability, offering critical insights for future progress. Zhenhong Zhou, Kun Wang 0056, Junfeng Fang, Rongwu Xu, Yuanhe Zhang, Xinfeng Li, Li Sun 0008, Lingjuan Lyu, Sen Su |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2025 | Mitigating privacy risks in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via locally private entity perturbation
Longzhu He, Peng Tang 0002, Yuanhe Zhang, Pengpeng Zhou, Sen Su |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 3 |
| 2024 | Quasi-Bayes meets VinesabstractRecently developed quasi-Bayesian (QB) methods \cite{fong2023martingale} proposed a stimulating change of paradigm in Bayesian computation by directly constructing the Bayesian predictive distribution through recursion, removing the need for expensive computations involved in sampling the Bayesian posterior distribution. This has proved to be data-efficient for univariate predictions, however, existing constructions for higher dimensional densities are only possible by relying on restrictive assumptions on the model's multivariate structure. Here, we propose a wholly different approach to extend Quasi-Bayesian prediction to high dimensions through the use of Sklar's theorem, by decomposing the predictive distribution into one-dimensional predictive marginals and a high-dimensional copula. We use the efficient recursive QB construction for the one-dimensional marginals and model the dependence using highly expressive vine copulas. Further, we tune hyperparameters using robust divergences (eg. energy score) and show that our proposed Quasi-Bayesian Vine (QB-Vine) is a fully non-parametric density estimator with \emph{an analytical form} and convergence rate independent of the dimension of the data in some situations. Our experiments illustrate that the QB-Vine is appropriate for high dimensional distributions ($\sim$64), needs very few samples to train ($\sim$200) and outperforms state-of-the-art methods with analytical forms for density estimation and supervised tasks by a considerable margin. David Huk, Yuanhe Zhang, Ritabrata Dutta, Mark Steel |
NeurIPS | 2 |