Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Samuel Howard

dblp:381/4346 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization
0.912025
Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis
0.912025
Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge
0.912025
Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching
0.912025
Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter
0.912025
Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score matching · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9log-domain smoothing · 0.9iterative proportional fitting · 0.9iterative markovian fitting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Diffusion Models and the Manifold Hypothesis: Log-Domain Smoothing is Geometry Adaptive
abstract
Diffusion models have achieved state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating remarkable generalisation capabilities across diverse domains. However, the mechanisms underpinning these strong capabilities remain only partially understood. A leading conjecture, based on the manifold hypothesis, attributes this success to their ability to adapt to low-dimensional geometric structure within the data. This work provides evidence for this conjecture, focusing on how such phenomena could result from the formulation of the learning problem through score matching. We inspect the role of implicit regularisation by investigating the effect of smoothing minimisers of the empirical score matching objective. Our theoretical and empirical results confirm that smoothing the score function—or equivalently, smoothing in the log-density domain—produces smoothing tangential to the data manifold. In addition, we show that the manifold along which the diffusion model generalises can be controlled by choosing an appropriate smoothing.
Tyler Farghly, Peter Potaptchik, Samuel Howard, George Deligiannidis, Jakiw Pidstrigach
NeurIPS3
2025 Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Tree-Structured Costs and Entropic Wasserstein Barycentres
abstract
Recent advances in flow-based generative modelling have provided scalable methods for computing the Schrödinger Bridge (SB) between distributions, a dynamic form of entropy-regularised Optimal Transport (OT) for the quadratic cost. The successful Iterative Markovian Fitting (IMF) procedure solves the SB problem via sequential bridge-matching steps, presenting an elegant and practical approach with many favourable properties over the more traditional Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) procedure. Beyond the standard setting, optimal transport can be generalised to the multi-marginal case in which the objective is to minimise a cost defined over several marginal distributions. Of particular importance are costs defined over a tree structure, from which Wasserstein barycentres can be recovered as a special case. In this work, we extend the IMF procedure to solve for the tree-structured SB problem. Our resulting algorithm inherits the many advantages of IMF over IPF approaches in the tree-based setting. In the case of Wasserstein barycentres, our approach can be viewed as extending the widely used fixed-point approach to use flow-based entropic OT solvers, while requiring only simple bridge-matching steps at each iteration.
Samuel Howard, Peter Potaptchik, George Deligiannidis
NeurIPS1