EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lakee Sivaraya
dblp:381/4718
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
shift equivariance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › neural processes
transformer neural processes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural Processes · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.8permutation invariant set functions · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Translation Equivariant Transformer Neural ProcessesabstractThe effectiveness of neural processes (NPs) in modelling posterior prediction maps—the mapping from data to posterior predictive distributions—has significantly improved since their inception. This improvement can be attributed to two principal factors: (1) advancements in the architecture of permutation invariant set functions, which are intrinsic to all NPs; and (2) leveraging symmetries present in the true posterior predictive map, which are problem dependent. Transformers are a notable development in permutation invariant set functions, and their utility within NPs has been demonstrated through the family of models we refer to as TNPs. Despite significant interest in TNPs, little attention has been given to incorporating symmetries. Notably, the posterior prediction maps for data that are stationary—a common assumption in spatio-temporal modelling—exhibit translation equivariance. In this paper, we introduce of a new family of translation equivariant TNPs that incorporate translation equivariance. Through an extensive range of experiments on synthetic and real-world spatio-temporal data, we demonstrate the effectiveness of TE-TNPs relative to their non-translation-equivariant counterparts and other NP baselines. Matthew Ashman, Cristiana Diaconu, Junhyuck Kim, Lakee Sivaraya, Stratis Markou, James Requeima, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Richard E. Turner |
ICML | 4 |