Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joon-Yong An

dblp:381/5478 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8839-6297ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 56% Medical and health informatics · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
evidence integration
1.012026
IDAP: an integrated literature- and knowledge-graph-driven evidence prioritization pipeline for precision oncology · Bioinform. 2026
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
precision oncology
1.012026
IDAP: an integrated literature- and knowledge-graph-driven evidence prioritization pipeline for precision oncology · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
knowledge graph
0.312026
IDAP: an integrated literature- and knowledge-graph-driven evidence prioritization pipeline for precision oncology · Bioinform. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

percentile normalization · 1.0literature mining · 1.0knowledge graph · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AnnQ: reference-based quantification of cellular abnormality at single-cell resolution
abstract
Reference-based annotation tools have become standard for cell type assignment in single-cell RNA sequencing, leveraging large-scale atlases to transfer labels to new datasets. However, a substantial fraction of cells often receive uncertain or ambiguous annotations-low confidence scores, competing label probabilities, or high entropy across cell types. These cells are typically treated as technical artifacts and filtered out, yet in perturbation experiments they may represent the biologically interesting deviations that investigators seek to identify. We present AnnQ (Annotation Quantification of cellular identity uncertainty), a Python framework that repurposes annotation uncertainty as a quantitative measure of cellular abnormality. AnnQ extracts uncertainty-aware features from probabilistic cell type assignments-including confidence, confidence gap, admixture ratio, and entropy-and computes an out-of-reference (OOR) score measuring each cell's deviation from a reference population in multivariate uncertainty space. Applying AnnQ to genetic perturbation and drug resistance datasets, we show that OOR scores detect aberrant cellular states that are not resolved by conventional clustering or differential abundance analyses. AnnQ provides a complementary approach for characterizing transitional and abnormal cell states at single-cell resolution. AnnQ is implemented in Python, and its source code and documentation are available on https://github.com/joonan-lab/AnnQ.git.
Davin Lee, Gaeun Byeon, Seojin Chung, Dongmin Shin, Jongseo Park, Ingyeon Koh, Joon-Yong An
Briefings Bioinform.7
2026 IDAP: an integrated literature- and knowledge-graph-driven evidence prioritization pipeline for precision oncology
abstract
MOTIVATION: Advances in tumor sequencing enable routine detection of dozens to hundreds of somatic alterations per patient, yet only a minority can be linked to established therapeutic evidence. Curated resources such as OncoKB provide high-quality variant-drug annotations but remain limited in coverage, particularly for rare or low-frequency variants. This coverage gap motivates computational frameworks that can integrate curated, literature-derived, graph-based, and clinical-trial evidence to prioritize therapeutic hypotheses for expert review. RESULTS: We developed the Integrated Drug Annotation Pipeline (IDAP), a modular framework that combines four complementary evidence streams: curated variant-drug associations from OncoKB, literature-derived gene-drug mention counts from PubMed abstracts, graph-based drug prioritization using a TxGNN-derived biomedical knowledge graph, and cancer-specific clinical-trial evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov. Given a cancer type and a MAF file, IDAP generates patient-level reports summarizing detected variants, ranked therapeutic hypotheses, supporting evidence layers, and relevant clinical trials. Evaluated across five cancer types (n = 50 samples), IDAP expanded evidence-linked therapeutic hypotheses beyond curated databases alone. Among patients without OncoKB recommendations (26/50), IDAP identified a median of 87 candidate drugs (range: 2-473). To reduce cross-source scale imbalance, the final ranking used within-sample percentile normalization with fixed bonuses for curated evidence, multi-source support, and trial linkage. Under this revised ranking, 24/50 top-ranked candidates were supported by at least two evidence sources and 44/50 had associated ClinicalTrials metadata. In an exploratory external CIViC comparison, IDAP recovered at least one matched CIViC-supported therapy in 28/41 eligible samples, with 13/41 appearing within the top 10 candidates. These outputs are intended to support evidence triage and translational interpretation rather than direct treatment recommendation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: IDAP is freely available at https://github.com/joonan-lab/IDAP-pipeline, with full documentation at https://joonan-lab.github.io/IDAP-pipeline. An archived snapshot of the code used in this study is deposited on Zenodo (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19301367).
Yebin Ryu, Ha-Eun Jeong, Joon-Yong An
Bioinform.3
2024 CWAS-Plus: estimating category-wide association of rare noncoding variation from whole-genome sequencing data with cell-type-specific functional data
abstract
Variants in cis-regulatory elements link the noncoding genome to human pathology; however, detailed analytic tools for understanding the association between cell-level brain pathology and noncoding variants are lacking. CWAS-Plus, adapted from a Python package for category-wide association testing (CWAS), enhances noncoding variant analysis by integrating both whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and user-provided functional data. With simplified parameter settings and an efficient multiple testing correction method, CWAS-Plus conducts the CWAS workflow 50 times faster than CWAS, making it more accessible and user-friendly for researchers. Here, we used a single-nuclei assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing to facilitate CWAS-guided noncoding variant analysis at cell-type-specific enhancers and promoters. Examining autism spectrum disorder WGS data (n = 7280), CWAS-Plus identified noncoding de novo variant associations in transcription factor binding sites within conserved loci. Independently, in Alzheimer's disease WGS data (n = 1087), CWAS-Plus detected rare noncoding variant associations in microglia-specific regulatory elements. These findings highlight CWAS-Plus's utility in genomic disorders and scalability for processing large-scale WGS data and in multiple-testing corrections. CWAS-Plus and its user manual are available at https://github.com/joonan-lab/cwas/ and https://cwas-plus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/, respectively.
Minwoo Jeong, In Gyeong Koh, Chanhee Kim, Hyeji Lee, Jae Hyun Kim, Ronald Yurko, Il Bin Kim, Jeongbin Park, Donna M. Werling, Stephan J. Sanders, Joon-Yong An
Briefings Bioinform.12