EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Laurel M. Hopkins
dblp:381/9162
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Data Augmentation Approaches for Satellite Imagery · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › remote sensing image classification
satellite imagery classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Data Augmentation Approaches for Satellite Imagery · AAAI 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging
satellite imagery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Data Augmentation Approaches for Satellite Imagery · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
slidemix · 1.7data augmentation · 1.7cutmix · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Data Augmentation Approaches for Satellite ImageryabstractDeep learning models commonly benefit from data augmentation techniques to diversify the set of training images. When working with satellite imagery, it is common for practitioners to apply a limited set of transformations developed for natural images (e.g., flip and rotate) to expand the training set without overly modifying the satellite images. There are many techniques for natural image data augmentation, but given the differences between the two domains, it is not clear whether data augmentation methods developed for natural images are well suited for satellite imagery. This paper presents an extensive experimental study on three classification and three regression tasks over four satellite image datasets. We compare common computer vision data augmentation techniques and propose three novel satellite-specific data augmentation strategies. Across tasks and datasets, we find that geometric transformations are beneficial for satellite imagery while color transformations generally are not. Additionally, our novel Sat-SlideMix, Sat-CutMix, and Sat-Trivial methods all exhibit strong performance across all tasks and datasets. Laurel M. Hopkins, Weng-Keen Wong, Hannah Kerner, Fuxin Li, Rebecca A. Hutchinson |
AAAI | 1 |