Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Faaiq Bilal

dblp:381/9358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-5526-6267ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Cellular and mobile networks · 65% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 18% Transport protocols and congestion control · 11%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks
5g
1.822026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Unveiling the 5G Mid-Band Landscape: From Network Deployment to Performance and Application QoE · SIGCOMM 2024
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › intelligent transportation systems
remote driving
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Cellular and mobile networks › low-latency communication
ultra-reliable low-latency communication
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Cellular and mobile networks › 5g
5g performance measurement
0.812024
Unveiling the 5G Mid-Band Landscape: From Network Deployment to Performance and Application QoE · SIGCOMM 2024
Edge and fog computing
edge cloud
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
real-time streaming
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
WebRTC
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qoe analysis · 1.0end-to-end measurement · 1.0cross-layer measurement · 1.0measurement study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet?
abstract
Remote driving, orteleoperating AutonomousVehicles (AVs), is a key application that emerging 5G networks aim to support. In this paper, we conduct a systematic feasibility study of AV teleoperation over commercial 5G networks from bothcross-layerandend-to-end (E2E)perspectives. Given the critical importance oftimely delivery of sensor data, such as camera and LiDAR data, for AV teleoperation, we focus in particular on the performance of uplink sensor data delivery. We analyze the impact of Physical Layer (PHY layer) 5G radio network factors, including channel conditions, radio resource allocation, and Handovers (HOs), on E2E latency performance. We also examine the impact of 5G networks on the performance of upper-layer protocols and E2E application Quality-of-Experience (QoE) of the adaptation mechanisms used for real-time sensor data delivery, such as Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). Our study reveals the challenges posed by today’s 5G networks and the limitations of existing sensor data streaming mechanisms. The insights gained will help inform the co-design of future-generation wireless networks, edge cloud systems, and applications to overcome the low-latency barriers in AV teleoperation.
Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Jason Carpenter, Rushikesh Zende, Sree Ganesh Lalitaditya Divakarla, Nitin Varyani, Faaiq Bilal, Steven Sleder, Nanditha Naik, Duncan Joly, Eman Ramadan, Ajay Kumar Gurumadaiah, Zhi-Li Zhang
IEEE Trans. Netw.6
2025 Warping the Edge: Enabling Instant Mobility for Stateful Applications over 5G and Beyond
abstract
Real-time mobile applications such as AR/VR, cloud gaming, and collaborative robotics rely on edge computing to maintain ultra-low latency, yet they can suffer noticeable service interruptions when users move because the application's session state must migrate to a new edge site. We present EdgeWarp, a system that delivers instant mobility for stateful edge applications over 5G while laying the groundwork for 6G. EdgeWarp employs a two-step synchronization protocol that proactively mirrors application state at edge sites predicted to serve the user next, sharply reducing transfer delays, and it signals each session's latency budget to the 5G control plane so that critical flows are prioritized during handover. Experiments with real applications and 4G/5G radio traces show that EdgeWarp cuts mobility-induced downtime by up to 15.4×, charting a path toward zero-downtime edge computing—a prerequisite for emerging 6G scenarios such as holographic telepresence, tactile Internet, and large-scale digital twins. We have made our anonymized code publicly accessible here.
Mukhtiar Ahmad, Faaiq Bilal, Mutahar Ali, Syed Muhammad Nawazish Ali, Amir Salman, Shazer Ali, Fawad Ahmad 0002, Zafar Ayyub Qazi
SEC2
2024 Unveiling the 5G Mid-Band Landscape: From Network Deployment to Performance and Application QoE
abstract
5G in mid-bands has become the dominant deployment of choice in the world. We present - to the best of our knowledge - the first comprehensive and comparative cross-country measurement study of commercial mid-band 5G deployments in Europe and the U.S., filling a gap in the existing 5G measurement studies. We unveil the key 5G mid-band channels and configuration parameters used by various operators in these countries, and identify the major factors that impact the observed 5G performance both from the network (physical layer) perspective as well as the application perspective. We characterize and compare 5G mid-band throughput and latency performance by dissecting the 5G configurations, lower-layer parameters as well as deployment settings. By cross-correlating 5G parameters with the application decision process, we demonstrate how 5G parameters affect application QoE metrics and suggest a simple approach for QoE enhancement. Our study sheds light on how to better configure and optimize 5G mid-band networks, and provides guidance to users and application developers on operator choices and application QoE tuning. We released the datasets and artifacts at https://github.com/SIGCOMM24-5GinMidBands/artifacts.
Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Claudio Fiandrino, Eman Ramadan, Jason Carpenter, Lilian Coelho de Freitas, Faaiq Bilal, Wei Ye 0009, Jörg Widmer, Feng Qian 0001, Zhi-Li Zhang
SIGCOMM6