EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan Gilcher
dblp:382/0110
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1111-8325ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 77% Authentication and access control · 23% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
hash functions |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SoK: Efficient Design and Implementation of Polynomial Hash Functions over Prime Fields · SP 2024 |
Authentication and access control › authentication
message authentication |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SoK: Efficient Design and Implementation of Polynomial Hash Functions over Prime Fields · SP 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | SoK: Efficient Design and Implementation of Polynomial Hash Functions over Prime Fields · SP 2024 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SoK: Efficient Design and Implementation of Polynomial Hash Functions over Prime FieldsabstractPoly1305 is a widely-deployed polynomial hash function. The rationale behind its design was laid out in a series of papers by Bernstein, the last of which dates back to 2005. As computer architectures evolved, some of its design features became less relevant, but implementers found new ways of exploiting these features to boost its performance. However, would we still converge to this same design if we started afresh with today’s computer architectures and applications? To answer this question, we gather and systematize a body of knowledge concerning polynomial hash design and implementation that is spread across research papers, cryptographic libraries, and developers’ blogs. We develop a framework to automate the validation and benchmarking of the ideas that we collect. This approach leads us to five new candidate designs for polynomial hash functions. Using our framework, we generate and evaluate different implementations and optimization strategies for each candidate. We obtain substantial improvements over Poly1305 in terms of security and performance. Besides laying out the rationale behind our new designs, our paper serves as a reference for efficiently implementing polynomial hash functions, including Poly1305. Jean Paul Degabriele, Jan Gilcher, Jérôme Govinden, Kenneth G. Paterson |
SP | 2 |