Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wan Theng Ruth Chew
dblp:382/3803
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | BILBO: BILevel Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2025 Optimistic Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraints · ICLR 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
bilevel optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BILBO: BILevel Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimistic Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraints · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trusted sets · 1.7regret bounds · 1.7confidence bounds · 1.7gaussian process · 0.8active learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BILBO: BILevel Bayesian OptimizationabstractBilevel optimization is characterized by a two-level optimization structure, where the upper-level problem is constrained by optimal lower-level solutions, and such structures are prevalent in real-world problems. The constraint by optimal lower-level solutions poses significant challenges, especially in noisy, constrained, and derivative-free settings, as repeating lower-level optimizations is sample inefficient and predicted lower-level solutions may be suboptimal. We present BILevel Bayesian Optimization (BILBO), a novel Bayesian optimization algorithm for general bilevel problems with blackbox functions, which optimizes both upper- and lower-level problems simultaneously, without the repeated lower-level optimization required by existing methods. BILBO samples from confidence-bounds based trusted sets, which bounds the suboptimality on the lower level. Moreover, BILBO selects only one function query per iteration, where the function query selection strategy incorporates the uncertainty of estimated lower-level solutions and includes a conditional reassignment of the query to encourage exploration of the lower-level objective. The performance of BILBO is theoretically guaranteed with a sublinear regret bound for commonly used kernels and is empirically evaluated on several synthetic and real-world problems. Wan Theng Ruth Chew, Quoc Phong Nguyen, Kian Hsiang Low |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Optimistic Bayesian Optimization with Unknown ConstraintsabstractThough some research efforts have been dedicated to constrained Bayesian optimization (BO), there remains a notable absence of a principled approach with a theoretical performance guarantee in the decoupled setting. Such a setting involves independent evaluations of the objective function and constraints at different inputs, and is hence a relaxation of the commonly-studied coupled setting where functions must be evaluated together. As a result, the decoupled setting requires an adaptive selection between evaluating either the objective function or a constraint, in addition to selecting an input (in the coupled setting). This paper presents a novel constrained BO algorithm with a provable performance guarantee that can address the above relaxed setting. Specifically, it considers the fundamental trade-off between exploration and exploitation in constrained BO, and, interestingly, affords a noteworthy connection to active learning. The performance of our proposed algorithms is also empirically evaluated using several synthetic and real-world optimization problems. Quoc Phong Nguyen, Wan Theng Ruth Chew, Kian Hsiang Low, Patrick Jaillet |
ICLR | 2 |