Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hao-Run Cai

dblp:382/5362 · also Haorun Cai · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-7303-3991ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 43% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 28% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Machine learning and data management · 79% Data mining · 21%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
1.012026
Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
tabular foundation model
1.012026
Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
tabular representation learning
1.012026
Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.912025
Understanding the Limits of Deep Tabular Methods with Temporal Shift · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular deep learning
0.912025
Understanding the Limits of Deep Tabular Methods with Temporal Shift · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift
0.912025
Feature-aware Modulation for Learning from Temporal Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning and data management
tabular data learning
0.912025
Talent: A Tabular Analytics and Learning Toolbox · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Data mining › tabular data
tabular data mining
0.312026
Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
machine learning tooling
0.312025
Talent: A Tabular Analytics and Learning Toolbox · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal learning · 2.0ensemble methods · 2.0deep neural network · 2.0temporal modulation · 0.9temporal embedding · 0.9normalization · 0.9fourier series expansion · 0.9feature transformation · 0.9feature encoding · 0.9deep learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey
abstract
Tabular data, structured as rows and columns, is among the most prevalent data types in machine learning classification and regression applications. Models for learning from tabular data have continuously evolved, with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) recently demonstrating promising results through their capability of representation learning. In this survey, we systematically introduce the field of tabular representation learning, covering the background, challenges, and benchmarks, along with the pros and cons of using DNNs. We organize existing methods into three main categories according to their generalization capabilities: specialized, transferable, and general models. Specialized models focus on tasks where training and evaluation occur within the same data distribution. We introduce a hierarchical taxonomy for specialized models based on the key aspects of tabular data-features, samples, and objectives-and delve into detailed strategies for obtaining high-quality feature- and sample-level representations. Transferable models are pre-trained on one or more datasets and subsequently fine-tuned on downstream tasks, leveraging knowledge acquired from homogeneous or heterogeneous sources, or even cross-modalities such as vision and language. General models, also known as tabular foundation models, extend this concept further, allowing direct application to downstream tasks without additional fine-tuning. We group these general models based on the strategies used to adapt across heterogeneous datasets. Additionally, we explore ensemble methods, which integrate the strengths of multiple tabular models. Finally, we discuss representative extensions of tabular learning, including open-environment tabular machine learning, multimodal learning with tabular data, and tabular understanding tasks.
Jun-Peng Jiang, Si-Yang Liu 0008, Hao-Run Cai, Qi-Le Zhou, Han-Jia Ye
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2025 Understanding the Limits of Deep Tabular Methods with Temporal Shift
abstract
Deep tabular models have demonstrated remarkable success on i.i.d. data, excelling in a variety of structured data tasks. However, their performance often deteriorates under temporal distribution shifts, where trends and periodic patterns are present in the evolving data distribution over time. In this paper, we explore the underlying reasons for this failure in capturing temporal dependencies. We begin by investigating the training protocol, revealing a key issue in how the data is split for model training and validation. While existing approaches typically use temporal ordering for splitting, we show that even a random split significantly improves model performance. By accounting for reducing training lag and validation bias to achieve better generalization ability, our proposed splitting protocol offers substantial improvements across a variety of methods. Furthermore, we analyses how temporal data affects deep tabular representations, uncovering that these models often fail to capture crucial periodic and trend information. To address this gap, we introduce a plug-and-play temporal embedding based on Fourier series expansion to learn and incorporate temporal patterns, offering an adaptive approach to handle temporal shifts. Our experiments demonstrate that this temporal embedding, combined with the improved splitting strategy, provides a more effective and robust framework for learning from temporal tabular data.
Hao-Run Cai, Han-Jia Ye
ICML1
2025 Feature-aware Modulation for Learning from Temporal Tabular Data
abstract
While tabular machine learning has achieved remarkable success, temporal distribution shifts pose significant challenges in real-world deployment, as the relationships between features and labels continuously evolve. Static models assume fixed mappings to ensure generalization, whereas adaptive models may overfit to transient patterns, creating a dilemma between robustness and adaptability. In this paper, we analyze key factors essential for constructing an effective dynamic mapping for temporal tabular data. We discover that evolving feature semantics—particularly objective and subjective meanings—introduce concept drift over time. Crucially, we identify that feature transformation strategies are able to mitigate discrepancies in feature representations across temporal stages. Motivated by these insights, we propose a feature-aware temporal modulation mechanism that conditions feature representations on temporal context, modulating statistical properties such as scale and skewness. By aligning feature semantics across time, our approach achieves a lightweight yet powerful adaptation, effectively balancing generalizability and adaptability. Benchmark evaluations validate the effectiveness of our method in handling temporal shifts in tabular data.
Hao-Run Cai, Han-Jia Ye
NeurIPS1
2025 Talent: A Tabular Analytics and Learning Toolbox
abstract
Tabular data is a prevalent source in machine learning. While classical methods have proven effective, deep learning methods for tabular data are emerging as flexible alternatives due to their capacity to uncover hidden patterns and capture complex interactions. Considering that deep tabular methods exhibit diverse design philosophies, including the ways they handle features, design learning objectives, and construct model architectures, we introduce Talent (Tabular Analytics and Learning Toolbox), a versatile toolbox for utilizing, analyzing, and comparing these methods. Talent includes over 35 deep tabular prediction methods, offering various encoding and normalization modules, all within a unified, easily extensible interface. We demonstrate its design, application, and performance evaluation in case studies. The code is available at https://github.com/LAMDA-Tabular/TALENT.
Si-Yang Liu 0008, Hao-Run Cai, Qi-Le Zhou, Huai-Hong Yin, Jun-Peng Jiang, Han-Jia Ye
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2