Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Miaoxuan Zhang

dblp:382/6176 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9185-3353ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 50% Language models and text generation · 25% Image recognition and object detection · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
0.912025
We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
OCR-Critic: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models' Perception through Critical Feedback · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › text recognition
optical character recognition
0.912025
OCR-Critic: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models' Perception through Critical Feedback · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.912025
We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning? · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual instruction tuning · 0.9large multimodal model · 0.9dynamic alignment strategy · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?
abstract
Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang, Zhuoma GongQue, Shanglin Lei, YiFan Zhang, Zhe Wei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Xiao Zong, Yida Xu, Peiqing Yang, Zhimin Bao, Muxi Diao, Chen Li, Honggang Zhang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong 0001, Minhui Wu, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang 0005, Zhuoma Gongque, Shanglin Lei, Miaoxuan Zhang, Runfeng Qiao, Xiao Zong, Peiqing Yang 0003, Zhimin Bao, Muxi Diao, Chen Li 0031, Honggang Zhang 0002
ACL (1)12
2025 OCR-Critic: Aligning Multimodal Large Language Models' Perception through Critical Feedback
abstract
Recent advancements in Large Multimodal Models have demonstrated impressive performance in various tasks. However, their capabilities in error detection and resolution for Optical Character Recognition (OCR) remain underexplored. To address this gap, we construct the first visual instruction tuning dataset specifically for detailed OCR error analysis. Building on this foundation, we develop a universal, plug-and-play OCR-Critic model that incorporates three novel dynamic alignment strategies. These strategies systematically mitigate LMMs' weaknesses in OCR tasks by providing coarse-to-fine error feedback. To comprehensively evaluate these capabilities, we introduce OCR-ERROR, a benchmark designed to assess LMMs' ability to detect and categorize OCR errors, covering two task types, diverse error categories, and 2,400 rigorously validated samples. Experimental results show that OCR-Critic effectively identifies fine-grained OCR errors across multiple domains. With the integration of our dynamic alignment strategies, the LMM further achieves substantial performance gains on four prominent benchmarks, demonstrating both versatility and effectiveness.
Qiuna Tan, Runqi Qiao, Guanting Dong 0001, Minhui Wu, Jiapeng Wang 0005, Miaoxuan Zhang, Chen Li 0031, Honggang Zhang 0002
ACM Multimedia7
2025 Face-Human-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Face and Human Understanding for Multi-modal Assistants
abstract
Faces and humans are crucial elements in social interaction and are widely included in everyday photos and videos. Therefore, a deep understanding of faces and humans will enable multi-modal assistants to achieve improved response quality and broadened application scope. Currently, the multi-modal assistant community lacks a comprehensive and scientific evaluation of face and human understanding abilities. In this paper, we first propose a hierarchical ability taxonomy that includes three levels of abilities. Then, based on this taxonomy, we collect images and annotations from publicly available datasets in the face and human community and build a semi-automatic data pipeline to produce problems for the new benchmark. Finally, the obtained Face-Human-Bench includes a development set and a test set, each with 1800 problems, supporting both English and Chinese. We conduct evaluations over 25 mainstream multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) with our Face-Human-Bench, focusing on the correlation between abilities, the impact of the relative position of targets on performance, and the impact of Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting on performance. We also explore which abilities of MLLMs need to be supplemented by specialist models. The dataset and evaluation code have been made publicly available at https://face-human-bench.github.io.
Lixiong Qin, Shilong Ou, Miaoxuan Zhang, Jiangning Wei, Xiaoshuai Song, Weiran Xu
NeurIPS3