Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
August Y. Chen
dblp:382/8071
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 67% Learning paradigms · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Statistical Learning from Attribution Sets · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Statistical Learning from Attribution Sets · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Statistical Learning from Attribution Sets · COLT 2026 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization, Isoperimetric Inequalities, and Sampling via Lyapunov Potentials · COLT 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
gradient flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization, Isoperimetric Inequalities, and Sampling via Lyapunov Potentials · COLT 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization, Isoperimetric Inequalities, and Sampling via Lyapunov Potentials · COLT 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization, Isoperimetric Inequalities, and Sampling via Lyapunov Potentials · COLT 2025 |
Recommender systems
conversion rate prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Statistical Learning from Attribution Sets · COLT 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unbiased estimator · 2.0empirical risk minimization · 2.0poincaré inequality · 0.9lyapunov potentials · 0.9log-sobolev inequality · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Statistical Learning from Attribution SetsabstractWe address the problem of training conversion prediction models in advertising domains under privacy constraints, where direct links between ad clicks and conversions are unavailable. Motivated by privacy-preserving browser APIs and the deprecation of third-party cookies, we study a setting where the learner observes a sequence of clicks and a sequence of conversions, but can only link a conversion to a set of candidate clicks (an attribution set) rather than a unique source. We formalize this as learning from attribution sets generated by an oblivious adversary equipped with a prior distribution over the candidates. Despite the lack of explicit labels, we construct an unbiased estimator of the population loss from these coarse signals via a novel approach. Leveraging this estimator, we show that Empirical Risk Minimization achieves generalization guarantees that scale with the informativeness of the prior and is also robust against estimation errors in the prior, despite complex dependencies among attribution sets. Simple empirical evaluations on standard datasets suggest our unbiased approach significantly outperforms common industry heuristics, particularly in regimes where attribution sets are large or overlapping. Lorne Applebaum, Róbert Busa-Fekete, August Y. Chen, Claudio Gentile, Tomer Koren, Aryan Mokhtari |
COLT | 3 |
| 2025 | Optimization, Isoperimetric Inequalities, and Sampling via Lyapunov PotentialsabstractIn this paper, we prove that optimizability of any function $F$ using Gradient Flow from all initializations implies a Poincaré Inequality for Gibbs measures $\mu_{\beta}\propto e^{-\beta F}$ at low temperature. In particular, under mild regularity assumptions on the convergence rate of Gradient Flow, we establish that $\mu_{\beta}$ satisfies a Poincaré Inequality with constant $O(C’)$ for $\beta \ge \Omega(d)$, where $C’$ is the Poincaré constant of $\mu_{\beta}$ restricted to a neighborhood of the global minimizers of $F$. Under an additional mild condition on $F$, we show that $\mu_{\beta}$ satisfies a Log-Sobolev Inequality with constant $O(S \beta C’)$ where $S$ denotes the second moment of $\mu_{\beta}$. Here asymptotic notation hides $F$-dependent parameters. At a high level, this establishes that optimizability via Gradient Flow from every initialization implies a Poincaré and Log-Sobolev Inequality for the low-temperature Gibbs measure, which in turn imply sampling from all initializations. Analogously, we establish that under the same assumptions, if $F$ can be initialized from everywhere except some set $\mathcal{S}$, then $\mu_{\beta}$ satisfies a Weak Poincaré Inequality with parameters $(O(C’), O(\mu_{\beta}(\mathcal{S})))$ for $\beta \ge \Omega(d)$. At a high level, this shows while optimizability from ‘most’ initializations implies a Weak Poincaré Inequality, which in turn implies sampling from suitable warm starts. Our regularity assumptions are mild and as a consequence, we show we can efficiently sample from several new natural and interesting classes of non-log-concave densities, an important setting with relatively few examples. As another corollary, we obtain efficient discrete-time sampling results for log-concave measures satisfying milder regularity conditions than smoothness, similar to Lehec (2023). August Y. Chen, Karthik Sridharan |
COLT | 1 |
| 2025 | Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points under Generalized Smoothness via Self-Bounding RegularityabstractWe study the optimization of non-convex functions that are not necessarily smooth (gradient and/or Hessian are Lipschitz) using first order methods. Smoothness is a restrictive assumption in machine learning in both theory and practice, motivating significant recent work on finding first order stationary points of functions satisfying generalizations of smoothness with first order methods. We develop a novel framework that lets us systematically study the convergence of a large class of first-order optimization algorithms (which we call decrease procedures) under generalizations of smoothness. We instantiate our framework to analyze the convergence of first order optimization algorithms to first and *second* order stationary points under generalizations of smoothness. As a consequence, we establish the first convergence guarantees for first order methods to second order stationary points under generalizations of smoothness. We demonstrate that several canonical examples fall under our framework, and highlight practical implications. Daniel Yiming Cao, August Y. Chen, Karthik Sridharan, Benjamin Tang |
NeurIPS | 2 |