Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Shenxi Wu

dblp:382/8720 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 56% Program synthesis and code generation · 44%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
1.012026
What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
Program analysis
code quality analysis
1.012026
What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › instruction following
instruction-following benchmark
0.912025
MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › multimodal large language model
multimodal instruction following
0.912025
MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following · ICCV 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
supervised fine-tuning
0.912025
MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following · ICCV 2025
Program analysis › static analysis
bug detection
0.312026
What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.0supervised fine-tuning · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 What is wrong with your code generated by large language models? An extensive study
Shihan Dou, Haoxiang Jia, Shenxi Wu, Huiyuan Zheng, Muling Wu, Yunbo Tao, Ming Zhang 0030, Mingxu Chai, Jessica Fan, Zhiheng Xi, Yueming Wu 0001, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang 0001, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001
Sci. China Inf. Sci.3
2025 MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following
abstract
The Instruction Following (IF) ability measures how well Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) understand exactly what users are telling them and whether they are doing it right. Existing multimodal instruction following training data is scarce, the benchmarks are simple with atomic instructions, and the evaluation strategies are imprecise for tasks demanding exact output constraints. To address this, we present MM-IFEngine, an effective pipeline to generate high-quality image-instruction pairs. Our MM-IFEngine pipeline yields large-scale, diverse, and high-quality training data MM-IFInstruct-23k, which is suitable for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and extended as MM-IFDPO-23k for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We further introduce MM-IFEval, a challenging and diverse multi-modal instruction-following benchmark that includes (1) both compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to the input images, and (2) a comprehensive evaluation pipeline incorporating both rule-based assessment and judge model. We conduct SFT and DPO experiments and demonstrate that fine-tuning MLLMs on MM-IFInstruct-23k and MM-IFDPO-23k achieves notable gains on various IF benchmarks, such as MM-IFEval (+10.2$\%$), MIA (+7.6$\%$), and IFEval (+12.3$\%$). We have fully open-sourced the datasets (both SFT and DPO), evaluation code and training scripts at https://github.com/SYuan03/MM-IFEngine.
Shengyuan Ding, Shenxi Wu, Yuhang Zang, Haodong Duan, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang 0001, Yuhang Cao, Dahua Lin, Jiaqi Wang 0003
ICCV2