Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuwei Liang
dblp:383/0799
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 65% Machine learning and data management · 35% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
tabular data representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MISS: An Incomplete Tabular Data Representation System with Missing Mechanism Learning · ICDE 2025 |
Machine learning and data management › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Federated Incomplete Tabular Data Prediction with Missing Complementarity · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MISS: An Incomplete Tabular Data Representation System with Missing Mechanism Learning · ICDE 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › missing data › missing value imputation
tabular data imputation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MISS: An Incomplete Tabular Data Representation System with Missing Mechanism Learning · ICDE 2025 |
Machine learning and data management › tabular data learning
tabular data prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Federated Incomplete Tabular Data Prediction with Missing Complementarity · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning
data quality |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy? · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing › data cleaning
data repair |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy? · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Federated Incomplete Tabular Data Prediction with Missing Complementarity · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 3.5unbiased representation loss · 1.7probability-driven transformer block · 1.7missing-aware attention · 1.7repair optimization · 0.8information-based taxonomy · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MISS: An Incomplete Tabular Data Representation System with Missing Mechanism LearningabstractThe missing data problem widely exists in real-life scenarios. The incomplete data analysis through imputation can amplify the errors or bias, hindering the effective analysis. Ex-isting tabular data representation methods overlook the missing state of data values, and thus cannot effectively deal with the incomplete data. In this paper, we propose a novel incomplete tabular data representation system, named MISS. It is capable of enabling all Transformer-based tabular representation methods to effectively handle incomplete data. MISS consists of two modules, i.e., missing mechanism learning (MML) and incomplete data representation (IDR). MML leverages a new missingness propensity score calculation strategy to learn the observed data distribution and missing mechanisms within incomplete data. IDR introduces a novel probability-driven Transformer block, in conjunction with an unbiased representation loss function, for effective representation. We prove that, MISS can eliminate the bias resulting from missingness. Extensive experiments on four public real-world datasets demonstrate that, MISS yields a more than 57 % accuracy gain with competitive efficiency, compared with the state-of-the-art approaches. Shuwei Liang, Lei Qiang, Xiaoye Miao, Xinkui Zhao, Junlan Cai, Yunjun Gao, Jianwei Yin |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2025 | Federated Incomplete Tabular Data Prediction with Missing ComplementarityabstractTabular data is abundant and crucial across both industry and academia. Federated learning (FL) offers a promising solution for the analysis of tabular data distributed across multiple organizations, without the need to share the privacy information of each client. Existing federated tabular data prediction methods optimize performance and privacy leakage under the completeness assumption of tabular data. They are not applicable in real-world scenarios that are struggling with missing values in tabular data. In this paper, we propose a novel federated prediction framework for incomplete tabular data, named DARN, which leverages the missing complementarity to directly optimize prediction performance without relying on the imputed values. It is especially beneficial when clients exhibit heterogeneity in missing data distributions, and the pairwise observed data are complementary. Specifically, each client trains a missing distribution learning model to capture the distribution of locally incomplete data. To assist in this, we present a missing-aware transformer block with a novel missing-aware attention mechanism to represent incomplete tabular data directly. The server calculates the personalized weights of the prediction models by combining missing complementary score and observed sample size score , thereby maximizing the utility of the available data. Extensive experiments on four publicly available real-world datasets demonstrate that DARN outperforms state-of-the-art methods with 25.80% improvement in both classification and regression tasks. Yan Zhang 0111, Shuwei Liang, Xiaoye Miao, Jianwei Yin |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2024 | Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy?abstractData quality is paramount in today's data-driven world, especially in the era of generative AI. Dirty data with errors and inconsistencies usually leads to flawed insights, unreliable decision-making, and biased or low-quality outputs from generative models. The study of repairing erroneous data has gained significant importance. Existing data repair algorithms differ in information utilization, problem settings, and are tested in limited scenarios. In this paper, we compare and summarize these algorithms with a driven information-based taxonomy. We systematically conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 12 mainstream data repair algorithms on 12 datasets under the settings of various data error rates, error types, and 4 downstream analysis tasks, assessing their error reduction performance with a novel but practical metric. We develop an effective and unified repair optimization strategy that substantially benefits the state of the arts. We conclude that, it is always worthy of data repair. The clean data does not determine the upper bound of data analysis performance. We provide valuable guidelines, challenges, and promising directions in the data repair domain. We anticipate this paper enabling researchers and users to well understand and deploy data repair algorithms in practice. Xiaoye Miao, Xiangyu Zhao 0001, Shuwei Liang, Jianwei Yin |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 5 |